IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,9/10
2770
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Eine Untersuchung der Forschung durch die forensische Psychiaterin Dorothy Otnow Lewis, die die Psychologie von Mördern untersuchte.Eine Untersuchung der Forschung durch die forensische Psychiaterin Dorothy Otnow Lewis, die die Psychologie von Mördern untersuchte.Eine Untersuchung der Forschung durch die forensische Psychiaterin Dorothy Otnow Lewis, die die Psychologie von Mördern untersuchte.
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 Nominierung insgesamt
Dorothy Otnow Lewis
- Self - Clinical Psychiatrist
- (as Dorothy Lewis)
Catherine Yeager
- Self - Clinical Psychologist
- (as Dr. Catherine Yeager)
Park Dietz
- Self - Forensic Psychiatrist
- (as Dr. Park Dietz)
Tom Brokaw
- Self - Host, NBC Nightly News with Tom Brokaw
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Bill Clinton
- Self - Governor of Arkansas
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Thomas Coccuzzi
- Self - Defense Attorney for Arthur Shawcross
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Laura Dern
- Self - Literary Voice of Dorothy Lewis
- (Synchronisation)
Walt Disney
- Self - Animator
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
- …
William Elledge
- Self - Convicted Murderer
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Henry Ford
- Self - Industrialist & Antisemite
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Joseph Paul Franklin
- Self - Convicted Murderer & Neo-Nazi Terrorist
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Alex Gibney
- Self - Filmmaker
- (Synchronisation)
Charles Gibson
- Self - ABC News Anchor
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Joseph Goebbels
- Self - Reich Minister of Propaganda, 1933 - 1945
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Hermann Göring
- Self - President of the Reichstag, 1932 - 1945
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Adolf Hitler
- Self - Führer and Chancellor of Germany
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Joseph P. Kennedy
- Self - Kennedy Family Patriarch & Antisemite
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Dr. Lewis likely has interviewed more serial killers than anyone else on the planet, but it is doubtful whether all that talk has produced any useful research on the subject. Her seeming determination to discover multiple personalities in every serial killer she interviews damages her credibility and exposes her stunning gullibility.
I think most reasonably intelligent people realize that some of the most sadistic, unempathetic, sociopathic criminals in our midst come from awful backgrounds, dysfunctional families, abuse, and trauma. The credibility of this program's assertions quickly ends there.
The program proceeds to document two academic psychotherapists being led around by the nose by some of the most manipulative personalities known, psychopathic sexual sadists and murderers. Murders who repeatedly and conveniently evidence, for the first time, multiple personality disorders, when interviewed by these two. Performances which are encouraged and almost welcomed with glee. If you want to watch something that will strip you of any faith you might have in defense "experts," watch this. This is the definition of confirmation bias in quasi-science.
The program proceeds to document two academic psychotherapists being led around by the nose by some of the most manipulative personalities known, psychopathic sexual sadists and murderers. Murders who repeatedly and conveniently evidence, for the first time, multiple personality disorders, when interviewed by these two. Performances which are encouraged and almost welcomed with glee. If you want to watch something that will strip you of any faith you might have in defense "experts," watch this. This is the definition of confirmation bias in quasi-science.
On the subject dissosiative personality disorder, or the scapegoat to every ''eye for an eye''-fanaticand criminal court systen back in the medeval ages of 1980's and 1990's usa. beloved and hatred for her simple claim that noone is born evil, and that there are always an environmental or medical disorder behind every crime, the worse a crime, the more damaged the perputrator are.having an ethical code that says if your insane you cannot be punished to death by excecution, and that is a roaring cry that should be heard among the medical and justice superiors in every criminal court anywhere.
its a docu that can make the viewer feel sick, and the mentaly instable turn unstable. because the case descriptions and lots of the material in the cases from real life are so grotesque, graphic and violent in its nature. so beware and behold, its an interesting ride, but can be a bold swallow to take.the grumpy old man recommends
its a docu that can make the viewer feel sick, and the mentaly instable turn unstable. because the case descriptions and lots of the material in the cases from real life are so grotesque, graphic and violent in its nature. so beware and behold, its an interesting ride, but can be a bold swallow to take.the grumpy old man recommends
Purely an "anti death penalty" movie based on the notion that ALL murderers are brain damaged or have multiple personality/dissociative identity disorder. A lot of it is just pure BS based in nothing close to real science.
This documentary provided little insight into the study of the disassociative mind but rather highlighted Dr. Lewis's view of her most spectacular interactions with famous murderers. The documentary managed to turn a fascinating subject into a 😴.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesDissociative Identity Disorder, formerly known as Multiple Personality Disorder, is a highly controversial diagnosis, with many arguments against it being anything more than an iatrogenic disorder -- in other words, caused by the therapy/therapist itself. Most notable amongst these arguments is that unlike other psychological disorders, DID is not observed outside of treatment with certain select clinicians, all of whom already believe in DID. What has been observed across all clinicians and researchers, however, are examples of confirmation bias, persuasive interview techniques, demand characteristics, and the oftentimes overwhelming urge to please demonstrated by patients in general. In addition, early North American works (DID is an overwhelmingly American disorder, yet another point of contention for the pro/anti-DID debate) which are seen as having started the DID diagnosis trend have been debunked in recent years as primarily fictitious stories, written to sell books. As controversial as the diagnosis of DID is, many feel that there may be some degree of negligence on the part of the producer(s), the director, and the film company as a whole for not employing a disclaimer as well as affording equal time to opposing expert viewpoints.
- VerbindungenReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 777: Mank + The Queen's Gambit (2020)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Crazy, Not Insane?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 59 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 16:9 HD
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen

Oberste Lücke
By what name was Crazy, Not Insane (2020) officially released in India in English?
Antwort