Aeropuerto 78: Vuelo supersónico

That so many good actors would get together in such a bad film. This movie's premise seems to be "take a cast, put them on an SST, and then subject them to trouble after trouble." I also find it hard to believe that so many good actors would have an off day every day of filming and at the same time. How many of their careers didn't get ruined by this film is beyond me, especially that of John de Lancie. Avoid this one at all costs. Airport '79 was a much better film, and Airplane! was a whole lot funnier.

This is a very enjoyable disaster movie, about yet another one of those star-filled planes heading for trouble. This time, a Concorde is sabotaged, and if that wasn´t enough, there is also a virus spreading inside the plane. The film has everything an airplane-disaster movie buff could ask for: tacky effects, lots of stars and fun dialogue. Pretty good stuff.

I watch a lot of disaster movies, and while I wouldn't place this with the Towering Inferno or The Poseidon Adventure, I enjoyed this a lot. I was surprised it was a TV movie because the acting was so good. They spent enough time for character development. There were several subplots, but that is true for many many disaster movies. I got this movie as part of a collection and some of the movies were really bad. This one was worth at least twice what I paid for the set. I will be watching this movie at least 3 times a year and definitely will recommend it to anyone who likes this kind of film. This movie was well worth my time. I was shocked that the only other review was really bad.

I am surprised that the score is so low. Okay, I admit the movie is technically bad but at least we got to see a lot of familiar faces here. You rarely see that in a TV movie. This is the only time I've seen Regis Philban in a movie of any kind. It was hard to recognize Billy Crystal. Probably the coolest part of this movie was when it showed that explosion. A pity it was just that one scene. I know that this movie is really clichéd. It probably helps that "Airplane!" is my favorite comedy too. They mocked stuff like this perfectly.

The version I saw was 92 minutes (on "Mystery Science Theater 3000"). This says it's only 89 minutes. Wow, that is the first time I have ever heard of a movie having a longer version being shown like that. It was certainly an interesting episode as it was their longest ever. Yeah, it's not worth watching on its own, but I think there have been many worse disaster films. I guess it probably did go on too long and there's still nothing unique about it. **

At a certain point during "SST: Death Flight", one of the passengers calms the others by saying that it's more dangerous to cross the street in a big city like New York, than to fly over the Atlantic in an airplane. He's probably correct, statistically speaking, but that most definitely wasn't the impression you got during the 70s, what with all the disaster movies with airplanes around that time! You could easily lose track of all the aviation disaster movies that were made during these two decades. There's the legendary "Airplane" series, of course, but also other random classics ("Skyjacked", "The Doomsday Flight", "The Crowded Sky", ...) and a whole lot of TV-movies-of-the-week. "SST: Death Flight" is a very formulaic, and by the looks of it also a rather unpopular movie, but I still found it enjoyable.

The problem with this film, and with practically every other made-for-TV disaster movie from the same period, is that it too much feels like a "light-version" of the aforementioned "Airport" series. It's always about a wide range of characters, struggling with their own banal private problems, gathering aboard an aircraft - usually for its maiden voyage - that will crash if it weren't for a handful of heroic people sacrificing themselves. "SST: Death Flight" at least tries to go the extra mile, with not one but TWO deadly issues. The supersonic jetliner's hydraulic system gets sabotaged by a frustrated company employee (who is stupid enough to be on board of the plane he sabotaged) and a doctor from the WHO brought a deadly African flu-virus in his suitcase.

You perfectly know what else to expect. Lots of familiar faces from the TV and cinema industry, usually long after their glory days, and you can generally predict straight away whether they'll be survivors or martyrs at the end. "SST: Death Flight" honestly isn't that bad if you embrace all the clichés and stereotypes. The performances, as well as David Lowell Rich's direction, are competent. Besides, Billy Crystal had to start his career somewhere, right?