Sigue a un criptógrafo de la CIA, que consigue chantajear a su agencia para que le entrenen y le dejen ir tras un grupo de terroristas que mataron a su mujer en Londres.Sigue a un criptógrafo de la CIA, que consigue chantajear a su agencia para que le entrenen y le dejen ir tras un grupo de terroristas que mataron a su mujer en Londres.Sigue a un criptógrafo de la CIA, que consigue chantajear a su agencia para que le entrenen y le dejen ir tras un grupo de terroristas que mataron a su mujer en Londres.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
Reseñas destacadas
I thoroughly enjoyed my time at the cinema watching The Amateur. It should have been a short series maybe 4-6 Episodes as opposed to a feature film. I think 2 hours did not leave enough time for proper character development. For example the lead speaks about his great friend played by Lawerence Fisburn in a scene at the end of the film. We never really saw how the two developed that bond as there are barely 2-3 scenes with them together throughout the movie. It was fun though and I feel more so because I watched it at the Theatre. Will definitely give it a rewatch once I can on my couch and recommend anyone who just wants to kick back to give it a watch.
Just Got out of a Screening of The Amateur.
It was Half Decent but there's a better film in here(especially the setup)
Problems I had with the Film -
📜👎 - The Setup of Charles' Wife being Killed was done in probably the least effective way possible. She dies, he's then told this and then we see bits and pieces of the Kidnapping. This was a cop out imo.
🤔 - It would of Been Far more effective if we actually saw a 6 to 7 minute scene of the Kings Cross London Terrorist Attack and the Subsequent Execution(without actually showing it though, just up to the moment when he pulls the trigger, they did that part right) of Charles' Wife. And then he is told & shown this.
😴 - There's far too many moments where stuff Just happens.
🤷 - The Ending with the Main Villain(which was actually a good Scene) could of been built up to far better if we had seen the villain throughout the film. But we don't, we only seen him at the Very End.
So Overall, it was ok but could of been far better.
It was Half Decent but there's a better film in here(especially the setup)
Problems I had with the Film -
📜👎 - The Setup of Charles' Wife being Killed was done in probably the least effective way possible. She dies, he's then told this and then we see bits and pieces of the Kidnapping. This was a cop out imo.
🤔 - It would of Been Far more effective if we actually saw a 6 to 7 minute scene of the Kings Cross London Terrorist Attack and the Subsequent Execution(without actually showing it though, just up to the moment when he pulls the trigger, they did that part right) of Charles' Wife. And then he is told & shown this.
😴 - There's far too many moments where stuff Just happens.
🤷 - The Ending with the Main Villain(which was actually a good Scene) could of been built up to far better if we had seen the villain throughout the film. But we don't, we only seen him at the Very End.
So Overall, it was ok but could of been far better.
"Amateur" starts off feeling pretty standard, but it grows on you. Think early 2000s spy thrillers-nerdier, more grounded, and rough around the edges. It doesn't try to reinvent the genre, but it leans into its simplicity with confidence. The pacing is fine-not too fast, not too slow-and while the story isn't particularly complex, it holds your attention. Rami Malek brings a steady, watchable presence, and the ending wraps things up in a way that feels satisfying.it's a solid, no-frills spy flick. One of those movies you watch without big expectations and walk away pleasantly surprised. Totally worth a shot on a chill night.
7.25/10 STARS - Saw this was based on a book and now I'm interested to listen to the audiobook (narrated by Scott Brick, who is a fantastic narrator). The movie itself was pretty good, and I enjoyed it. There were some issues here and there with conveniences when it came to his ability to get things done and some moments where suspension of disbelieve was required. Perhaps this was partly because it felt like there was a lot omitted along the way, not clearly showing us how he was able to accomplish what he did. Maybe some more scenes showing him having to figure out how to get to where he needed to be in order to sabotage something would have been good (like in the swimming pool scene). But since this movie was already more than two hours long, I suppose it might be a bit much to show us everything. I liked that we got a good feel for the main characters intense grief over the loss of his wife and his determination to make everyone pay - yet totally out of his element when it came to the brutality of face-to-face killing. Video review will be available on my YouTube channel shortly.
Hey Hollywood -- we need more movies like these. Not a remake. Not a sequel. Dramatic. Something ANYBODY over the age of 12 could be taken to, AND enjoy. This is the first decent movie I've seen in months. I'd go to the theaters every week, if there was something to see.
Back to the movie. Interesting premise. Not a whodunnit. More of a "howsHegonnadoit". Acting on the whole was was fair -- but the main plot characters kept it going well. Remind Malik, Caitríona Balfe, Laurence Fishburne, Rachel Brosnahan -- all gave great performances.
The pacing was good -- knowing how many revenge subplots were going to happen kept the movie moving without me checking my watch.
Thank you for an original movie.
Back to the movie. Interesting premise. Not a whodunnit. More of a "howsHegonnadoit". Acting on the whole was was fair -- but the main plot characters kept it going well. Remind Malik, Caitríona Balfe, Laurence Fishburne, Rachel Brosnahan -- all gave great performances.
The pacing was good -- knowing how many revenge subplots were going to happen kept the movie moving without me checking my watch.
Thank you for an original movie.
New and Upcoming Book-to-Screen Adaptations
New and Upcoming Book-to-Screen Adaptations
From literary classics to graphic novels and more, see what books have recently made, or will be making the leap to the big (and small) screen in 2025 and beyond.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesThe film's source novelist is Robert Littell who has been a journalist and novelist who specializes in espionage novels that frequently are set around the spy world of the CIA and the former Soviet Union. He wrote the screenplay for the original movie of 'The Amateur' then wrote the novel of the same name afterwards. The book has a slightly different title, it being "The Amateur: A Novel of Revenge (1981)". The original 'Amateur' movie was his first film & TV credit.
- PifiasDuke University Hospital at Raleigh, was Raleigh Community Hospital and wasn't part of the Duke University Hospital system until 1998. Heller being in his mid 30s (Sarah was 34 when she died), would have meant that Heller was born at the Duke University Hospital in Durham, not Raleigh.
- ConexionesReferences James Bond contra Goldfinger (1964)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is The Amateur?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- El Amateur: operación venganza
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 60.000.000 US$ (estimación)
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 40.759.635 US$
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- 14.802.849 US$
- 13 abr 2025
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 96.000.836 US$
- Duración2 horas 2 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta

Principal laguna de datos
By what name was Amateur (2025) officially released in India in Hindi?
Responde