Una joven de 17 años se ve obligada a trasladarse con su familia a un complejo turístico donde las cosas no son lo que parecen.Una joven de 17 años se ve obligada a trasladarse con su familia a un complejo turístico donde las cosas no son lo que parecen.Una joven de 17 años se ve obligada a trasladarse con su familia a un complejo turístico donde las cosas no son lo que parecen.
- Premios
- 3 premios y 11 nominaciones en total
Marton Csokas
- Luis
- (as Marton Csókás)
Astrid Bergès-Frisbey
- Ed
- (as Àstrid Bergès-Frisbey)
Reseñas destacadas
Okay. Sorry in advance for the rant.
Great buildup. Eerie atmosphere. An unusual isolated ___location. A compelling mystery. Imagery that's creepy in an uncanny way. Some interesting ideas. A visual style (and a couple other elements) that reminded me (positively) of A Cure for Wellness.
However, while something like the slasher genre can afford to have a number of unlikable characters due to their large casts and the fact that the majority of them are meant to be unsympathetic in order to grant a sense of catharsis when they're killed horribly, focused thrillers with one lead that you're supposed to be rooting for don't benefit from the same allowance. In Cuckoo, Gretchen has literally nothing to recommend her. Until a point halfway through the movie (which isn't hidden but she treats like any other so you kind of forget about it despite it completely changing her motivations), she's unfailingly moody, rude, incompetent, stupid, ungrateful, selfish, reckless, arrogant, lazy, awkward, aggressive, dishonest, entitled, and insincere, and despite all that, she's indescribably boring, ensuring that one couldn't care less what happens to her because she fails to display even a single positive personality trait. I actually had to triple-check to make sure it wasn't the same writer as Dark, the paragon of creating uninteresting, unlikable characters. Though Schafer's acting doesn't do her any favors either.
Besides that, there's sloppy, repetitive exposition and some glaring scientific/logical problems if you think about the plentiful explanations they provide for more than 5 seconds. I only finished it because Dan Stevens' charm, combined with the aforementioned elements, made it watchable, but jeez it was a slog.
Would not recommend.
Great buildup. Eerie atmosphere. An unusual isolated ___location. A compelling mystery. Imagery that's creepy in an uncanny way. Some interesting ideas. A visual style (and a couple other elements) that reminded me (positively) of A Cure for Wellness.
However, while something like the slasher genre can afford to have a number of unlikable characters due to their large casts and the fact that the majority of them are meant to be unsympathetic in order to grant a sense of catharsis when they're killed horribly, focused thrillers with one lead that you're supposed to be rooting for don't benefit from the same allowance. In Cuckoo, Gretchen has literally nothing to recommend her. Until a point halfway through the movie (which isn't hidden but she treats like any other so you kind of forget about it despite it completely changing her motivations), she's unfailingly moody, rude, incompetent, stupid, ungrateful, selfish, reckless, arrogant, lazy, awkward, aggressive, dishonest, entitled, and insincere, and despite all that, she's indescribably boring, ensuring that one couldn't care less what happens to her because she fails to display even a single positive personality trait. I actually had to triple-check to make sure it wasn't the same writer as Dark, the paragon of creating uninteresting, unlikable characters. Though Schafer's acting doesn't do her any favors either.
Besides that, there's sloppy, repetitive exposition and some glaring scientific/logical problems if you think about the plentiful explanations they provide for more than 5 seconds. I only finished it because Dan Stevens' charm, combined with the aforementioned elements, made it watchable, but jeez it was a slog.
Would not recommend.
I had high hopes for this movie. It starts off pretty well, slow paced, setting the isolated stage in a good way, odd characters and an eerie setting. I liked it. Then it started getting creepier and creepier and it felt like I was in for something good and different, and I was. Just not consistently the way I hoped for as it only lasted up to a certain point, and then it dropped the ball. Suddenly it felt like the movie didn't know what it wanted to be, as it went in different moods and directions.
It did try to get back on the creepy track here and there, but it was not enough. The illusion of a really creepy and eerie setting was over, and the rest was a rather bland mix of pointless motions which had me simply waiting for the end of the movie so I could go and do something else. It's a shame, I wanted it to keep on the way it initially did. That would have set it apart from other horror movies, but alas no, it wasn't meant to be. It just had to try to add some action into the mix, and not in a good way. The whole premise was explained and I lost interest in it.
One of the rules when making creepy and unsettling stories; do not explain! Do not! That ruins everything. I don't want to know what the monster or horror is, I want my mind to try to fill in the blanks. I don't want it explained to me. I can take the fact that I don't know what I just saw is, that makes the effect that much greater. The thing about not knowing what the evil really is, not knowing where it came from, that's a great part of the horror it represents. The fear of the unknown is as old as all living things and should not be ruined when making these movies. Once you explain it, it's over. How copywriters and directors misses this point again and again in movie after movie is completely beyond me. If you can avoid it, don't show the monster, but if you do, make sure it gets maximum effect and not for shock value. Ever since Alien there's not a monster in any movie that tops that one, so don't go over the top trying to beat it, because you won't succeed. In this one the monster worked, it was creepy as hell, even though we got to see it so it was well done in this circumstance, until they explained it. Do not ever explain the monster!
Just like the movie Smile, which also showed a great initial promise, this movie simply faded away into just another horror movie that explains a really good and mysterious premise and then ruins it because of it, that couldn't keep itself together, and so became just another easily forgotten movie. It is indeed a real shame as it showed such promise from start.
Perhaps the director will learn from his mistakes and do better next time.
It did try to get back on the creepy track here and there, but it was not enough. The illusion of a really creepy and eerie setting was over, and the rest was a rather bland mix of pointless motions which had me simply waiting for the end of the movie so I could go and do something else. It's a shame, I wanted it to keep on the way it initially did. That would have set it apart from other horror movies, but alas no, it wasn't meant to be. It just had to try to add some action into the mix, and not in a good way. The whole premise was explained and I lost interest in it.
One of the rules when making creepy and unsettling stories; do not explain! Do not! That ruins everything. I don't want to know what the monster or horror is, I want my mind to try to fill in the blanks. I don't want it explained to me. I can take the fact that I don't know what I just saw is, that makes the effect that much greater. The thing about not knowing what the evil really is, not knowing where it came from, that's a great part of the horror it represents. The fear of the unknown is as old as all living things and should not be ruined when making these movies. Once you explain it, it's over. How copywriters and directors misses this point again and again in movie after movie is completely beyond me. If you can avoid it, don't show the monster, but if you do, make sure it gets maximum effect and not for shock value. Ever since Alien there's not a monster in any movie that tops that one, so don't go over the top trying to beat it, because you won't succeed. In this one the monster worked, it was creepy as hell, even though we got to see it so it was well done in this circumstance, until they explained it. Do not ever explain the monster!
Just like the movie Smile, which also showed a great initial promise, this movie simply faded away into just another horror movie that explains a really good and mysterious premise and then ruins it because of it, that couldn't keep itself together, and so became just another easily forgotten movie. It is indeed a real shame as it showed such promise from start.
Perhaps the director will learn from his mistakes and do better next time.
I went to the "Secret Screaming" screening of "Cuckoo" last night, though I was pretty confident, based on the fact it's already out in the US, that this would be the film that Cineworld were going to show. My feelings about the film remain mixed, even having taken a night to ruminate on it.
Following the death of her mother, Gretchen (Hunter Schafer) moves with her father Luis (Marton Csokas), Stepmother Beth (Jessica Henwick) and Stepsister Alma (Mila Lieu) to a cabin resort in the German Alps. The family are there to design an expansion to the complex, at the request of Herr Konig (Dan Stevens), the owner of the resort. Konig offers Gretchen a job working at the hotel's reception, but on the strict understanding that she must not work the late shift, and definitely won't cycle home through the woods at night.
Just because it's an easier place to start, I will say that I don't think I found "Cuckoo" particularly scary. There's an excellently framed set piece near the start of the film - that was unfortunately mostly featured in the trailer, and a couple of body horror moments that work, but it's really more of a thriller than a genuine horror film.
I will say that I imagine that a fair proportion of people will be shaken off by the film. It's not particularly accessible, being wilfully stylish and trippy and taking a while to get to its explanations - though if you stick with it, they are coming. Dan Stevens, always amazing, is back again (for this, my third film of his this year) and he's having a great time as the eccentric Herr Konig. Schafer (also, ironically in a third film of the year for me) carries the movie though, she's in every scene and manages to keep you onside despite her character doing some questionable things. She has some more dramatic scenes as the film progresses and her emotional (and physical) suffering is well done.
I suppose the best I can do is say that I don't regret watching "Cuckoo", which has enough scenes and moments to make up for the slightly unsatisfying whole. I'll never need to watch it again though.
Following the death of her mother, Gretchen (Hunter Schafer) moves with her father Luis (Marton Csokas), Stepmother Beth (Jessica Henwick) and Stepsister Alma (Mila Lieu) to a cabin resort in the German Alps. The family are there to design an expansion to the complex, at the request of Herr Konig (Dan Stevens), the owner of the resort. Konig offers Gretchen a job working at the hotel's reception, but on the strict understanding that she must not work the late shift, and definitely won't cycle home through the woods at night.
Just because it's an easier place to start, I will say that I don't think I found "Cuckoo" particularly scary. There's an excellently framed set piece near the start of the film - that was unfortunately mostly featured in the trailer, and a couple of body horror moments that work, but it's really more of a thriller than a genuine horror film.
I will say that I imagine that a fair proportion of people will be shaken off by the film. It's not particularly accessible, being wilfully stylish and trippy and taking a while to get to its explanations - though if you stick with it, they are coming. Dan Stevens, always amazing, is back again (for this, my third film of his this year) and he's having a great time as the eccentric Herr Konig. Schafer (also, ironically in a third film of the year for me) carries the movie though, she's in every scene and manages to keep you onside despite her character doing some questionable things. She has some more dramatic scenes as the film progresses and her emotional (and physical) suffering is well done.
I suppose the best I can do is say that I don't regret watching "Cuckoo", which has enough scenes and moments to make up for the slightly unsatisfying whole. I'll never need to watch it again though.
Disappointment. It's made with such a serious tone, but the things that are happening are so silly and stupid that the whole theatre was laughing. If the director made it a campy horror movie, it would be fine but you can feel that Tilman Singer had absurdly high artistic vision for this. That movie really has an identity crisis - it wants to be a horror, family drama and some weird action movie but it's just unintentionally funny. The script is stupid and has weird twist that isn't fully explained, so the audience didn't really understood what's going on and WHY is that whole thing happening.
However when it comes to positives, it has interesting visual choices. I also adore that weird, surreal atmosphere and acting perfomances by Hunter Schafer and Dan Stevens. And overall, that movie was fun to watch even if the comedy in that movie was unintentional.
Is it worth watching in cinema? No.
Is it worth watching at home? Yeah, if ur looking for fun, dumb horror movie,
However when it comes to positives, it has interesting visual choices. I also adore that weird, surreal atmosphere and acting perfomances by Hunter Schafer and Dan Stevens. And overall, that movie was fun to watch even if the comedy in that movie was unintentional.
Is it worth watching in cinema? No.
Is it worth watching at home? Yeah, if ur looking for fun, dumb horror movie,
Cuckoo is a movie in a genre I love, and in a subgenre I frequently enjoy. I also regularly love complex movies that keep you guessing. I also love really weird movies. To say "this movie is not for me" would be inaccurate. Yet I pretty much hated it.
As the movie went along, I understood less and less. I couldn't fully grasp what was happening. I kept telling myself to be patient, and maybe it will pay off. But nope. There is nothing satisfying if you wait it out. And there are tons of unanswered questions and things that make no sense.
But the biggest failure is the inability to make me care about the characters or story at all. During the climax, I repeatedly thought, "I don't care." I just wanted it to end so I could go home.
There are some creepy moments. I'm a fan of actors Dan Stevens and Jessica Henwick, but they aren't given much to do. And in the end, I had a terrible time with this movie.
(1 viewing, opening night 8/8/2024)
As the movie went along, I understood less and less. I couldn't fully grasp what was happening. I kept telling myself to be patient, and maybe it will pay off. But nope. There is nothing satisfying if you wait it out. And there are tons of unanswered questions and things that make no sense.
But the biggest failure is the inability to make me care about the characters or story at all. During the climax, I repeatedly thought, "I don't care." I just wanted it to end so I could go home.
There are some creepy moments. I'm a fan of actors Dan Stevens and Jessica Henwick, but they aren't given much to do. And in the end, I had a terrible time with this movie.
(1 viewing, opening night 8/8/2024)
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesThere was a brief misconception online that the movie was to be released in four different parts after Neon released four characters posters titled "Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4."
- PifiasWhen Herr König is explaining what is happening to Gretchen, he talks to her in english, which makes sense since she's American. Afterwards, he starts talking to Henry and Erik, and stays with english even though all three of them are German.
- Banda sonoraString Quartet No. 1 in F Major, Op. 18/1 II. Adagio affettuoso ed appassionato
Written by Ludwig van Beethoven
Performed by Vlach Quartet
Published by Sonoton Music, Munich, Germany
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Cuckoo?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idiomas
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Зозуля
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 7.000.000 US$ (estimación)
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 6.217.733 US$
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- 3.030.437 US$
- 11 ago 2024
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 6.559.163 US$
- Duración1 hora 42 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta

Principal laguna de datos
What is the Canadian French language plot outline for Cuckoo (2024)?
Responde