Un estafador llamado Ripley que vive en Nueva York durante los años 60 es contratado por un hombre adinerado para iniciar una compleja vida de engaños, fraudes y asesinatos.Un estafador llamado Ripley que vive en Nueva York durante los años 60 es contratado por un hombre adinerado para iniciar una compleja vida de engaños, fraudes y asesinatos.Un estafador llamado Ripley que vive en Nueva York durante los años 60 es contratado por un hombre adinerado para iniciar una compleja vida de engaños, fraudes y asesinatos.
- Ganó 4 premios Primetime Emmy
- 20 premios ganados y 57 nominaciones en total
Explorar episodios
Opiniones destacadas
Be warned, once you start, this series will keep you hooked.
Ripley is depicted very differently to the charming person from the film.
Awkward. Calculating. Desperate.
That's how I'd sum him up.
And this is not only filmed beautifully in crisp 4K with visual finesse and a Hitchcock feel.
It has just the right attention to sound design with a beautiful composition.
The character reactions, where more is said with less words kept me intrigued.
It is a mini series but you'll feel like you're watching one great movie after the next as you go from episode to episode.
And one I'd be happy to watch more than once.
Ripley is depicted very differently to the charming person from the film.
Awkward. Calculating. Desperate.
That's how I'd sum him up.
And this is not only filmed beautifully in crisp 4K with visual finesse and a Hitchcock feel.
It has just the right attention to sound design with a beautiful composition.
The character reactions, where more is said with less words kept me intrigued.
It is a mini series but you'll feel like you're watching one great movie after the next as you go from episode to episode.
And one I'd be happy to watch more than once.
Black and white never looked so beautiful. I doubt even early 1960s Italy was this beautiful. This was the most visually stunning project I have seen in decades.
The performances were excellent as well as the direction. The writing was a bit drawn out. This really could have been two hours shorter, but you really don't mind it.
If Netflix could come up with something half this good on a semi monthly basis they'd be in the black again. This wasn't just visually appealing it was actually mature and reasonably cerebral. Miles above their usual offerings.
Warning: If you watch this, you will become addicted.
The performances were excellent as well as the direction. The writing was a bit drawn out. This really could have been two hours shorter, but you really don't mind it.
If Netflix could come up with something half this good on a semi monthly basis they'd be in the black again. This wasn't just visually appealing it was actually mature and reasonably cerebral. Miles above their usual offerings.
Warning: If you watch this, you will become addicted.
In my mind, Alain Delon in Rene Clement's 1960 "Purple Noon" was the definitive Tom Ripley. Beautiful and totally amoral. Anthony Minghella's 1999 "The Talented Mr Ripley" had a bland but thoughtful Tom Ripley who felt and suffered. Minghella had a superb script, Gwyneth Paltrow, Philip Seymour Hoffman and Cate Blanchett playing riveting, unforgettable characters. There was also John Malcovich in a Liliana Cavani version, and although I've seen it, I don''t remember it, isn't that terrible? And the Wim Wenders version with Dennis Hopper doesn't count, good film, but it doesn't count as a version of Patricia Highsmith's novel. Now this. Ripley, the series. Hours long, in black and white. My first reaction was to rejected it but the truth is that I finish seeing it over a week ago and stayed with me, I can't shake it off. Why I wonder. And the reason is very simple. Steven Zaillian's version is truly wonderful. He has de-glamorized it. The whole thing. The story, the characters. Oh the characters. I was so used to see beautiful people playing them, in gloriously glamorous locations. This version is stark and Andrew Scott is like a replicant. No emotions, not even a hint of them. Invisible. As a consequence we do all the work. We gasp or look away. He just goes on. I know I'm going to see Ripley again, maybe not tomorrow but soon. I suspect you will too.
I loved the 'Talented Mr Ripley' version, however, have enjoyed this just as much in a different way. I liked the fact that it didn't just try to copy the last version. I was a bit taken a back at the older Tom Ripley in this version but just decided that a longer time period had passed and got used to it.
I thought the actor playing Tom was fabulous and also the different Marge was streets better than Gwyneth Paltrow whom I thought was the big weakness in the previous version.
The black and white worked so well with this, more sinister, and moody version. Whilst the colour of the last version worked with the 'Talented' version which portrayed a much more extraverted and upbeat Dickie.
The negative element for me this time was Dickie. There seemed to be nothing to like about him and he lacked any charisma at all. He was a bit wooden and sexless to be honest. Last time, you felt that Tom had fallen so in love with the Jude Law version that he could not bear to be rejected by him or live without him. This time, I just felt that Tom wanted to take over his lifestyle but had no feelings for him. So, I think this version has fewer layers to it and something was missing.
Still, you just need to accept that this is a completely different version, and it is very watchable and intriguing. Certainly, the actor playing Tom IS the film. I think worth it just for his acting.
I thought the actor playing Tom was fabulous and also the different Marge was streets better than Gwyneth Paltrow whom I thought was the big weakness in the previous version.
The black and white worked so well with this, more sinister, and moody version. Whilst the colour of the last version worked with the 'Talented' version which portrayed a much more extraverted and upbeat Dickie.
The negative element for me this time was Dickie. There seemed to be nothing to like about him and he lacked any charisma at all. He was a bit wooden and sexless to be honest. Last time, you felt that Tom had fallen so in love with the Jude Law version that he could not bear to be rejected by him or live without him. This time, I just felt that Tom wanted to take over his lifestyle but had no feelings for him. So, I think this version has fewer layers to it and something was missing.
Still, you just need to accept that this is a completely different version, and it is very watchable and intriguing. Certainly, the actor playing Tom IS the film. I think worth it just for his acting.
This masterpiece of a series is completely unique from the movie, and really elicits its own distinctive film noir vibe both in cinematography and dialogue. Purposeful yet subtle performances by all involved; Andrew Scott is absolutely perfect for this role.
I haven't seen a TV series interpreted from a film source this well since Hannibal, where Mads Mikkelsen was also perfectly cast and gave an unforgettable performance.
What else can be said about this series? A bit of a slow burn, but the pacing is completely suitable, and allows for a bit more fleshing out and development of the characters. Although I love the vibrant colors along the coast of Italy as much as anyone, I feel the choice to use a monochromatic palette here really enhanced the mood and atmosphere of the story.
Top notch production in all aspects!
I haven't seen a TV series interpreted from a film source this well since Hannibal, where Mads Mikkelsen was also perfectly cast and gave an unforgettable performance.
What else can be said about this series? A bit of a slow burn, but the pacing is completely suitable, and allows for a bit more fleshing out and development of the characters. Although I love the vibrant colors along the coast of Italy as much as anyone, I feel the choice to use a monochromatic palette here really enhanced the mood and atmosphere of the story.
Top notch production in all aspects!
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaAndrew Scott is the sixth actor to portray Tom Ripley on film, after
- Créditos curiosos"The Equilizer 3" was also filmed in Atrani (film name there: Altamonte). In this movie Dakota Fanning was also participating.
- ConexionesFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 TV Shows of 2024 (So Far) (2024)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How many seasons does Ripley have?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Ріплі
- Locaciones de filmación
- Pio Monte della Misericordia, Via dei Tribunali, 253, 80139 Napoli NA, Italia(Home of Caravaggio's 'The Seven Works of Mercy'.)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta

Principales brechas de datos
What was the official certification given to Ripley (2024) in Canada?
Responda