Dans le West End du Londres des années 1950, les plans de la version cinématographique d'une pièce de théâtre à succès s'arrêtent brusquement après le meurtre d'un membre essentiel de l'équi... Tout lireDans le West End du Londres des années 1950, les plans de la version cinématographique d'une pièce de théâtre à succès s'arrêtent brusquement après le meurtre d'un membre essentiel de l'équipe.Dans le West End du Londres des années 1950, les plans de la version cinématographique d'une pièce de théâtre à succès s'arrêtent brusquement après le meurtre d'un membre essentiel de l'équipe.
- Nomination aux 1 BAFTA Award
- 4 nominations au total
Avis à la une
Sam Rockwell gives a great lead performance as the calm amongst a very chaotic storm of over the top performances with an impressively strong accent that never slips. Saorsie Ronan is the standout though with fantastic comedic timing and an always lovable presence.
Tom George's direction is really good, thankfully not too focused on homaging Wes Anderson and instead delivering a stylish film with some snappy editing and nice split screen. The music by Daniel Pemberton is good, matching the films quirky nature.
It's a movie that talks about itself throughout, it's a whodunnit film and as mentioned in the movie, once you see one you've seen them all. The plot of the movie is the plot of the theatre play and movie, that's inside the movie, so when a clue is revealed in one story you know it's the same for the other.
It's suspenseful throughout but not really engaging enough to keep you on your seat. You're not really invested in any of the characters unless you're already a fan of the actors playing them, which I was. I've seen it compared to "knives out" but I don't think it's that good. Nothing really special about it because it just doesn't click, feels like it's supposed to though. There's a lot of funny bits that carry the film, but those feel like an accessory, not actually what the movie is supposed to be about, just something to elevate it. It's meant to be a mystery but the mystery doesn't do much.
It's made to be pretty simple and quirky, I think it would've been better if it took itself a little more seriously and maybe slowed down a bit. Funny and 1950's retro so there's things to love about it, but confused about what's it's meant to be so it feels all over the place.
There is a really good cast with great characters, all bringing different things to the film. Having real life characters add something to the film as well.
I laughed a lot during the film with some of the characters and some of the jokes being very well done.
Its a reminder that there can be a great film made without the need for huge amounts of cgi, huge budgets and massive casts. This is just well written, well portrayed and with brilliant camera work, and just works really well.
It's a relatively short movie, around 1h30, it goes by quickly, it doesn't take much time and it serves as a pastime if you don't have anything else interesting to see.
Despite being a "whodunit", the mystery surrounding the killer itself does not hold much attention, the script is silly and the solution to the case is not impactful at all, what really counts in the film is the fun atmosphere and the actors' performance. Typical movie that in 6 months you won't even remember it properly.
6 out of 10.
It was exciting in the beginning and it kept me entertained as it progressed, till some events happened that were strongly related to the plot and did not make any sense to me. That was disappointing in addition to the movie's ending.
The acting of the main characters was not perfect but was not bad either. There was a lot of sarcastic comedy some throughout the movie of which made me laugh.
I am sad that my rating had to drop from 7 to 6 as I liked the movie but I wish if it was executed in a better way.
After all, it was a fun experience and I do not regret watching it. If you are looking for a silly movie with a mystery to solve, watch it.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesRichard "Dickie" Attenborough greets the detectives as "Darling." This was a real-life quirk of Attenborough's which he admitted he would often use if he forgot someone's name.
- GaffesAt the end, Inspector Stoppard is awarded the King's Medal for police etc. This movie is set in 1953; while Queen Elizabeth ascended to the throne in February 1952, the name of the King's Medals were not changed to Queen's Medals until May 1954, so it is accurate that the award Stoppard received would be called "King's."
- Citations
Max Mallowan: Better make that eight for dinner, Fellowes, and let Agatha know.
Fellowes: Yes, sir.
Max Mallowan: And get a shovel to clear the path.
Fellowes: Yes, sir.
Max Mallowan: And do we have enough coal?
Fellowes: Yes, sir. Three bags full, sir.
- ConnexionsFeatured in 2023 EE BAFTA Film Awards (2023)
- Bandes originalesPrendi, Prendi, Per me sei libero
From the opera "L'Elisir d'Amore"
Written by Gaetano Donizetti
Performed by Magyar Állami Operaház Énekkara és Zenekara (as Hungarian State Opera Chorus and Orchestra)
Conducted by Pier Giorgio Morandi
Courtesy of Naxos
By arrangement with Source/Q
Meilleurs choix
- How long is See How They Run?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Mira cómo corren
- Lieux de tournage
- Freemasons' Hall, 60 Great Queen Street, Covent Garden, Westminster, Greater London, Angleterre, Royaume-Uni(The Ambassadors Theatre, bar)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 40 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 9 586 237 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 3 007 657 $US
- 18 sept. 2022
- Montant brut mondial
- 21 966 634 $US
- Durée1 heure 38 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
