NOTE IMDb
4,6/10
1,6 k
MA NOTE
L'histoire d'une petite délinquante de la classe ouvrière qui se transforme en une anti-héroïne avec laquelle il faut compter dans un monde obscur, celui de la contrebande de diamants.L'histoire d'une petite délinquante de la classe ouvrière qui se transforme en une anti-héroïne avec laquelle il faut compter dans un monde obscur, celui de la contrebande de diamants.L'histoire d'une petite délinquante de la classe ouvrière qui se transforme en une anti-héroïne avec laquelle il faut compter dans un monde obscur, celui de la contrebande de diamants.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Avis à la une
Earlier this month, I had binge through all of Neil Marshall's filmography and it was a fun experience for the most part. Now, I just finished watching his latest movie, Duchess (2024) and it was very mediocre.
Positives for Duchess (2024): Charlotte Kirk gives a good performance as the titular character in this movie. There are spots to where the B-Action side of this movie can be fun. And finally, the action sequences in this movie are good.
Negatives for Duchess (2024): The movie's premise is all that interesting to begin with. There are some noticeably bad performances from the other actors. And finally, the movie's runtime is dragged out way too long.
Overall, Duchess (2024) is one of those movies where it depends on you go into this movie and what you are expecting from it, so I would recommend that you go check this movie out for yourself.
Positives for Duchess (2024): Charlotte Kirk gives a good performance as the titular character in this movie. There are spots to where the B-Action side of this movie can be fun. And finally, the action sequences in this movie are good.
Negatives for Duchess (2024): The movie's premise is all that interesting to begin with. There are some noticeably bad performances from the other actors. And finally, the movie's runtime is dragged out way too long.
Overall, Duchess (2024) is one of those movies where it depends on you go into this movie and what you are expecting from it, so I would recommend that you go check this movie out for yourself.
Good enough for a TV pilot episode.
Camera work, background music, lighting, editing, sets, TV grade. If it were a show, I'd watch it. But, I would not pay to watch it in a theater, but I'd regularly watch this as a show. I swear it seemed like a pilot. Then there was a murder torture scene that shifted the entire tone, it felt out of place, then the tone suddenly lightened up again. Then it shifts and shifts again. Its like the creators couldn't decide what exactly the kind of movie or even TV show they were making. Script is full of cliche's. Expected for a TV, not a movie. Title style ___location labels pop across the sceen like an 80's action show. There are a unneeded pauses, for emotional reflection. Characters pontificate to spell out motivations and intentions. The script seems like it was written by young out of work would be TV writers.
Camera work, background music, lighting, editing, sets, TV grade. If it were a show, I'd watch it. But, I would not pay to watch it in a theater, but I'd regularly watch this as a show. I swear it seemed like a pilot. Then there was a murder torture scene that shifted the entire tone, it felt out of place, then the tone suddenly lightened up again. Then it shifts and shifts again. Its like the creators couldn't decide what exactly the kind of movie or even TV show they were making. Script is full of cliche's. Expected for a TV, not a movie. Title style ___location labels pop across the sceen like an 80's action show. There are a unneeded pauses, for emotional reflection. Characters pontificate to spell out motivations and intentions. The script seems like it was written by young out of work would be TV writers.
Surely, no Oscar material, or a match to Guy Ritchi's Gentlemen, but this movie gave me a very entertaining two hours with a well told story, massive efforts from not very talented actors (but efforts go a long way) and a consistent use of practical effects.
Surprisingly, the few well-known names (Meany and Pertwee) deliver the films least memorable moments, but Colm Meany's worst is still on par with the lead actors' best. But the lead cast do try to "steal the show" from them. Kirk delivers a solid performance as lead and I do not felt that I ever dropped my attention or got bored of her as the lead.
Altogether, I enjoyed this move and I wouldn't mind seeing it again in a few months' time.
Surprisingly, the few well-known names (Meany and Pertwee) deliver the films least memorable moments, but Colm Meany's worst is still on par with the lead actors' best. But the lead cast do try to "steal the show" from them. Kirk delivers a solid performance as lead and I do not felt that I ever dropped my attention or got bored of her as the lead.
Altogether, I enjoyed this move and I wouldn't mind seeing it again in a few months' time.
It's that all familiar style of movie with the names of characters popping out to introduce them with some silly narration completely unnecessarily, some "funny" violence and all the characters are some kind of criminals. Except the dialogues are weak, there is not enough action, and it lasts 2 hours.
It's not a total trainwreck, camera work, effects, even the acting is solid but the characters aren't particularly interesting at all. The main lady is attractive.
Some of the characters have a rather strong accent which some might find hard to understand.
I'm not a fan of this type of movie in the first place but even if you are this is one of the weaker ones for sure.
It's not a total trainwreck, camera work, effects, even the acting is solid but the characters aren't particularly interesting at all. The main lady is attractive.
Some of the characters have a rather strong accent which some might find hard to understand.
I'm not a fan of this type of movie in the first place but even if you are this is one of the weaker ones for sure.
It's a shame Neil Marshall has gone down to this level. After his magnificent start (Dog Soldiers, Descent, Doomsday) it appears he peaked very early in his career.
The dialogue is very predictable. The story been told a million times and much better.
Unconvincing fights and overlong back and forth shoot outs become tiresome.
Tiger pit was hilariously overused.
The lead actress isn't as drop dead gorgeous as the director seems to think she is.
Her accent grates. Her fighting is terrible.
When so many kick ass female characters out there (Atomic Blonde, Red Sparrow, Nikita, Ava. Anna, Salt to name just a few) all done so much better it's kinda been done to death so if going to do it. Do it well and maybe a little different.
Sean Pertwee is always a fun watch, even if okays the same character in every film. He's a regular with Neil since Dog Soldiers.)
Stephanie Beecham is hilarious as "Charlie" the supposed dangerous hhead of a criminal organisation. But was cringe. Maybe they thought this would be her new breakout rolel playing against type (like Hugh Grant in The Gentlemen) of so then big fail.
Ita not all terrible. Just forced and cliché. The narration by the female lead was irritating straight away. Yes. That Snatch Guy Ritchie era narration wasn't good as the less you heard her voice the better.
Credit to the surprise desert death which I didn't see coming. One of only a few good moments.
Oh Neil. What happened?
Just go watch Atomic Blonde again.
The dialogue is very predictable. The story been told a million times and much better.
Unconvincing fights and overlong back and forth shoot outs become tiresome.
Tiger pit was hilariously overused.
The lead actress isn't as drop dead gorgeous as the director seems to think she is.
Her accent grates. Her fighting is terrible.
When so many kick ass female characters out there (Atomic Blonde, Red Sparrow, Nikita, Ava. Anna, Salt to name just a few) all done so much better it's kinda been done to death so if going to do it. Do it well and maybe a little different.
Sean Pertwee is always a fun watch, even if okays the same character in every film. He's a regular with Neil since Dog Soldiers.)
Stephanie Beecham is hilarious as "Charlie" the supposed dangerous hhead of a criminal organisation. But was cringe. Maybe they thought this would be her new breakout rolel playing against type (like Hugh Grant in The Gentlemen) of so then big fail.
Ita not all terrible. Just forced and cliché. The narration by the female lead was irritating straight away. Yes. That Snatch Guy Ritchie era narration wasn't good as the less you heard her voice the better.
Credit to the surprise desert death which I didn't see coming. One of only a few good moments.
Oh Neil. What happened?
Just go watch Atomic Blonde again.
Le saviez-vous
- Bandes originalesDiamonds in my heart
Written and performed by Barbara Falzoni
Produced by Rudy Perez
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Duchess?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 60 869 $US
- Durée1 heure 54 minutes
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
