Un étudiant en mathématiques de troisième cycle découvre que l'on tente de détruire son travail de recherche d'un modèle de nombres premiers qui lui permettrait d'accéder à tous les ordinate... Tout lireUn étudiant en mathématiques de troisième cycle découvre que l'on tente de détruire son travail de recherche d'un modèle de nombres premiers qui lui permettrait d'accéder à tous les ordinateurs du monde.Un étudiant en mathématiques de troisième cycle découvre que l'on tente de détruire son travail de recherche d'un modèle de nombres premiers qui lui permettrait d'accéder à tous les ordinateurs du monde.
Parcourir les épisodes
Résumé
Reviewers say 'Prime Target' presents a fascinating yet uneven mix of mathematical themes and global intrigue. Praised for its innovative premise and strong performances, it delves into human obsession, technology, and morality. However, some find the pacing slow and the plot unrealistic, with inconsistent writing. Acting reviews are mixed, and its complex themes may alienate some viewers. Overall, it’s an ambitious series with a divided reception.
Avis à la une
So we have a mid 20-ish NSA agent stationed in the most expensive property in France. So we have a bob-cut mid-50-ish NSA bigwig, clueless director who nonchalantly orders multiple murders and then rescinds those directives in the next breath. We have a 40-ish NSA thug agent whose entire acting repertoire consists of "smell the broken wind" acting and a constant sneer. To top off the horrendous miscasting of this disaster, we add a pretty boy math whiz without a clue.
This was a simply dreadful program that never even minimally explains the root of the story. Too bad the budget did not include decent writers or passable actors.
This was a simply dreadful program that never even minimally explains the root of the story. Too bad the budget did not include decent writers or passable actors.
Alfred Hitchcock said that Maguffin shouldn't be revealed because it shows how silly plots are. This series tipped it's hand very early and sure enough, Hitchcock was right. A driven but maverick PhD mathematics student is working on prime numbers but the security services don't want that. Cue mysterious deaths and ancient artifacts. A kind of Indiana Jones and the Lost Integral.
There's a bit of really shallow exposition about prime numbers and the preposterous idea that all the university library books have been deleted. Protagonist gets upset rather than going to Amazon next day delivery. I just kept yawning.
There's a bit of really shallow exposition about prime numbers and the preposterous idea that all the university library books have been deleted. Protagonist gets upset rather than going to Amazon next day delivery. I just kept yawning.
It started off strong, then went downhill. Poor acting from some, lack of emotional connection, and no interesting relationships. Could have been good, the story line was cool but lacked execution. Not up to Apple TV standards. Previously would feel comfortable watching anything on Apple TV knowing it would be good, but this show just ruined that standard for me.
Edward was played well and he did his job well, but the rest of them were terrible. The female character from NSA was so bad, felt like I couldn't watch her. Felt like the directors were throwing everything into the mix with them going to Baghdad, France and the UK. Seemed a bit all over the place.
Edward was played well and he did his job well, but the rest of them were terrible. The female character from NSA was so bad, felt like I couldn't watch her. Felt like the directors were throwing everything into the mix with them going to Baghdad, France and the UK. Seemed a bit all over the place.
It's not quite clear who the audience is for this series. Is it trying to appeal to people wanting to engage with intriguing scientific theories? Or is it trying to appeal to Gen Z feeling misunderstood for their genius?
On the one hand teasing intriguing questions on the nature of science and mathematics. And how archaeology may unearth interesting new theories.
And then, a supposed math genius who in the Cambridge library system searches for "prime numbers"... And then doesn't find anything in the library catalogue about prime numbers because it's been deleted.
I mean... it isn't consistent to its own universe. And that is very disrupting.
On the one hand teasing intriguing questions on the nature of science and mathematics. And how archaeology may unearth interesting new theories.
And then, a supposed math genius who in the Cambridge library system searches for "prime numbers"... And then doesn't find anything in the library catalogue about prime numbers because it's been deleted.
I mean... it isn't consistent to its own universe. And that is very disrupting.
The basic idea is great: the notion that a gov't might kill to keep a possible math shortcut, that would instantly render useless modern cryptography, from being discovered isn't totally ridiculous.
Though I'm sufficiently interested to finish the series, what sank this for me, as already mentioned by others, are things such as the "check-list" attributes assigned to characters and thus the selected actors. Consequently, I found the casting was hit and miss. That may have also been a result of the direction. E.g. In episode 5, particularly, one veteran actor may well have been given direction to "imagine Matthew Goode in the role and act like him".
And the script wasn't great.
6/10 means interesting enough to watch it through but prioritize other, much better, viewing options.
Though I'm sufficiently interested to finish the series, what sank this for me, as already mentioned by others, are things such as the "check-list" attributes assigned to characters and thus the selected actors. Consequently, I found the casting was hit and miss. That may have also been a result of the direction. E.g. In episode 5, particularly, one veteran actor may well have been given direction to "imagine Matthew Goode in the role and act like him".
And the script wasn't great.
6/10 means interesting enough to watch it through but prioritize other, much better, viewing options.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesEdward Brooks is shown to be left-handed. A study by C.P. Benbow in 1986 found the frequency of left-handedness among exceptionally gifted mathematics students was significantly higher than in the general population.
- GaffesToutes les informations contiennent des spoilers
- ConnexionsReferenced in kuji: Artur Chaparyan: Jokes are Not Needed (2025)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
