IMDb रेटिंग
6.4/10
2.4 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंA sailor returns to his hometown after 7 years and remembers the dark and the light moments of his past.A sailor returns to his hometown after 7 years and remembers the dark and the light moments of his past.A sailor returns to his hometown after 7 years and remembers the dark and the light moments of his past.
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
- पुरस्कार
- कुल 1 नामांकन
Hjördis Petterson
- Sofi
- (as Hjördis Pettersson)
Douglas Håge
- Tullmannen
- (काटे गए सीन)
Ami Aaröe
- Ung flicka på stranden
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Torgny Anderberg
- En man
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Ingmar Bergman
- Man i basker vid kasperteatern på tivolit
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Rolf Bergström
- Alexanders kumpan (1)
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
John W. Björling
- En äldre man på varietéscenen
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Ingrid Borthen
- Flicka på gatan
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Gustaf Hiort af Ornäs
- Alexanders kumpan (2)
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Was only introduced to Ingmar Bergman seven years ago and very quickly he landed on my list of best and most influential directors. He did have occasional disappointments here and there (a vast majority of directors did/do), such as 'All Those Women' and 'The Serpent's Egg'. But he was great once he found his style, and quite a lot of his films are masterpieces such as 'The Seventh Seal', 'Fanny and Alexander', 'Wild Strawberries', 'Cries and Whispers', 'Persona' and 'The Virgin Spring'.
His third film 'A Ship to India' as director, following on from 'Crisis' and 'It Rains on Our Love', is a long way from being one of the master's best. Then again this was very early on in his career and when he was still finding his style properly. For such early Bergman however, 'A Ship to India' is a very interesting film and one can see signs of his distinctive style and themes already, it is also a not bad at all one. Actually thought it was quite well done on the whole.
As always for a Bergman film, there is some very nice photography (though this aspect has certainly been done better and more inspired in later Bergman films). Likewise with good use of very atmospheric locations. Bergman's direction became more refined and instinctive later on, then again it is early days, but one can definitely see a lot of promise here. The script s thoughtful, having the tension and emotion necessary.
The story is unmistakable Bergman in terms of themes and the tensions between the characters are believable. Emotionally it didn't feel cold. The acting is very strong from a chillingly cruel Holger Lowenadler and Birger Malmsten portrays a character worth relating to.
For all those good things, the uneven character writing also works against 'A Ship to India'. It is agreed that motivations are hard to buy, due to them being introduced suddenly without much warning and contradicting anything sad before. There were things crying out for explanation left hanging in the air.
On the most part the photography is fine but parts are a bit on the drab side. Some of the intensity wavers later on, with a few dreary moments.
Summarising, interesting and well done but Bergman is not at his best here. 7/10
His third film 'A Ship to India' as director, following on from 'Crisis' and 'It Rains on Our Love', is a long way from being one of the master's best. Then again this was very early on in his career and when he was still finding his style properly. For such early Bergman however, 'A Ship to India' is a very interesting film and one can see signs of his distinctive style and themes already, it is also a not bad at all one. Actually thought it was quite well done on the whole.
As always for a Bergman film, there is some very nice photography (though this aspect has certainly been done better and more inspired in later Bergman films). Likewise with good use of very atmospheric locations. Bergman's direction became more refined and instinctive later on, then again it is early days, but one can definitely see a lot of promise here. The script s thoughtful, having the tension and emotion necessary.
The story is unmistakable Bergman in terms of themes and the tensions between the characters are believable. Emotionally it didn't feel cold. The acting is very strong from a chillingly cruel Holger Lowenadler and Birger Malmsten portrays a character worth relating to.
For all those good things, the uneven character writing also works against 'A Ship to India'. It is agreed that motivations are hard to buy, due to them being introduced suddenly without much warning and contradicting anything sad before. There were things crying out for explanation left hanging in the air.
On the most part the photography is fine but parts are a bit on the drab side. Some of the intensity wavers later on, with a few dreary moments.
Summarising, interesting and well done but Bergman is not at his best here. 7/10
The baggage the youthful Ingmar Bergman was carrying about his parent's generation finds vivid expression in this, his third feature, from his early "neo-realist" phase, which combines an extremely melodramatic plot about a hunch-backed young man (Birger Malmsten) struggling with the baleful influence of his macho, bullying father (Holger Löwenadler), set against an arresting backdrop of documentary-style footage of life among working folk. The noisy musical score by Erland von Koch marks it out as a very early Bergman.
I was shocked when Bergman called his first film, Crisis, "lousy through and through". But, this time I might agree. Melodramatic might be an appropriate adjective for this film. The directing and the screenplay work in opposite directions. If the directing is perhaps accentuating Bergman's fear concerning his relationship with his father, it is forgetting the romance into making it a lame melodrama.
Again, A Ship to India, Bergman's third film has some interesting ideas and proves his technical abilities. However, this time, due to the essence of Martin Söderhjelm, his formalist ideas (camera angles, lighting, dissolve) works against him.
Again, A Ship to India, Bergman's third film has some interesting ideas and proves his technical abilities. However, this time, due to the essence of Martin Söderhjelm, his formalist ideas (camera angles, lighting, dissolve) works against him.
The main characters in this story, told in flashback, are all struggling with life, and in this film Bergman give us a painful father/son relationship that probably reflects the difficulties he had with his own dad. Here the son has grown up a disappointment to his father because of a small hump on his back and a milder personality, while the middle-aged father, a bully, feels as though he's missed out on things in life and wants to run off to the south Pacific with a showgirl. His mother has suffered from abuse over the years, and her husband now wanting to leave seems especially unjust since she worked hard with him in the early days of their business salvaging old boats, which she recounts in one of the film's best scenes. The showgirl herself knows a thing about pathos too; she's been poor and turned to prostitution in the past, giving her a jaded outlook and the belief that love never lasts, so she just wants to be kept comfortable by a man.
With all of the difficult emotions in play the setup was interesting to me, and there are a few beautiful shots along the rocky Swedish coastline as well. Where the film falters is in being overly melodramatic, e.g. the father being made to be going blind on top of everything else, and the son falling for the showgirl. There is a fantastic moment of tension when the son goes diving in a suit that requires his father to manually pump air down to him, but its emotional power and some of the other angst in the film is eroded because it tries to fit so many other things in. Restraint and focus were needed so that the characters and their relationships could have more depth. Bergman was still finding his way here, but nonetheless it's interesting to watch him at this stage of his career.
With all of the difficult emotions in play the setup was interesting to me, and there are a few beautiful shots along the rocky Swedish coastline as well. Where the film falters is in being overly melodramatic, e.g. the father being made to be going blind on top of everything else, and the son falling for the showgirl. There is a fantastic moment of tension when the son goes diving in a suit that requires his father to manually pump air down to him, but its emotional power and some of the other angst in the film is eroded because it tries to fit so many other things in. Restraint and focus were needed so that the characters and their relationships could have more depth. Bergman was still finding his way here, but nonetheless it's interesting to watch him at this stage of his career.
Two men on a ship are fighting for the affections of a woman. In 1962 Roman Polanski had a breakthrough with this in the film "Knife in the water". In 1947 however Bergman was still learning and the quality of "A ship bound for India" in no way justified a breakthrough.
In "A ship bound for India" the two men are father and son, and by Bergman this signals an autobiographical element, the more so when the father is very authoritarian. The son resists the authority of his father and the woman "only" is a catalyst of this resistance. "Only" is however put a little too mildly because the woman gives the boy the needed self confidence to change his silent resistance into explicit resistance.
The film has some weak points. In the first place the father is too much the bad guy and the son too mucht the good guy. Secondly the father is authoritarian in a fysical way, in other words he is violent. I think the film would have been more interesting had the father been authoritarian in a spiritual way and the fight of the son was not to become as strong as his father but to develop his own personality.
In one scene Bergman shows his potential as the great director he would become. The diving scene, working magnificently with shadwos, is pure expressionism.
In "A ship bound for India" the two men are father and son, and by Bergman this signals an autobiographical element, the more so when the father is very authoritarian. The son resists the authority of his father and the woman "only" is a catalyst of this resistance. "Only" is however put a little too mildly because the woman gives the boy the needed self confidence to change his silent resistance into explicit resistance.
The film has some weak points. In the first place the father is too much the bad guy and the son too mucht the good guy. Secondly the father is authoritarian in a fysical way, in other words he is violent. I think the film would have been more interesting had the father been authoritarian in a spiritual way and the fight of the son was not to become as strong as his father but to develop his own personality.
In one scene Bergman shows his potential as the great director he would become. The diving scene, working magnificently with shadwos, is pure expressionism.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाIngmar Bergman: 17'50" into the film, can be seen in the amusement park, watching the performance of "Kasper Teater", a marionette show.
- इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जनAmerican version, under the title "Frustration", runs 78 minutes. While most of the Swedish version is told as an extended flashback, the US cut omits the "present day" prologue and instead offers the story chronologically.
- कनेक्शनEdited into Spisok korabley (2008)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is A Ship to India?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 38 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.37 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें
