जब दोस्तों का एक समूह डिनर पार्टी के लिए, एक शाम को इकट्ठा होता है तो एक धूमकेतु उपरि से गुजर रहा होता है तब अजीब चीजें होने लगती हैं.जब दोस्तों का एक समूह डिनर पार्टी के लिए, एक शाम को इकट्ठा होता है तो एक धूमकेतु उपरि से गुजर रहा होता है तब अजीब चीजें होने लगती हैं.जब दोस्तों का एक समूह डिनर पार्टी के लिए, एक शाम को इकट्ठा होता है तो एक धूमकेतु उपरि से गुजर रहा होता है तब अजीब चीजें होने लगती हैं.
- पुरस्कार
- 6 जीत और कुल 6 नामांकन
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Great cerebral sci-fi. If you're looking for aliens and spaceships this ain't it but if you like the twilight zone kinda stuff this is a good one. Maybe I was in the right mood for it but I really enjoyed this one. The characters were believable and what I thought were holes in the plot turned out not to be. not sure I would have been thrilled to see it in a movie theater at present ticket and snack prices but a good rental. Gotta pay attention and don't worry if you can't catch everything being said in the first part as it's just party chatter.
Not all questions answered and the premise is not, I think, meant to be exactly the Schrodinger cat thing but just something to motivate the action. Just because the characters discuss something doesn't mean they figured everything out right.
Not all questions answered and the premise is not, I think, meant to be exactly the Schrodinger cat thing but just something to motivate the action. Just because the characters discuss something doesn't mean they figured everything out right.
Based upon viewer comments, this is either great or horrible and, for my money, I agree in both cases. Maybe it's a matter of expectation? If you like movies with effects and high production values (no shame in that) this isn't for you. It you like creators trying to be unique, then this might be fun.
For me, there are a couple ooooo moments that make this worth while. And I love that Nicholas Brendan's twin brother shows up as a special effect, like he did in that really good episode of Buffy.
For me, there are a couple ooooo moments that make this worth while. And I love that Nicholas Brendan's twin brother shows up as a special effect, like he did in that really good episode of Buffy.
COHERENCE is a fun, twisty tale about eight friends at a party, who are caught up in a quantum quagmire when a mysterious comet passes overhead. Their festivities fizzle when things begin to get complicated, confusing, and dangerous. As the characters attempt to extricate themselves from a knot of converging realities, their actions seem to only make matters worse.
Is there any way out of their ponderous predicament?
The film's impromptu-style dialogue adds to the sense of realism. Though the science may be "far-fetched", the story is engaging and quite entertaining, and -probably- wasn't meant as a physics lesson...
Is there any way out of their ponderous predicament?
The film's impromptu-style dialogue adds to the sense of realism. Though the science may be "far-fetched", the story is engaging and quite entertaining, and -probably- wasn't meant as a physics lesson...
Coherence kept popping up on lists of best sci-fi films which was surprising because I had never seen a trailer or heard anything about it. I found it free to stream somewhere, so I checked it out, and I am so glad I did! What I found was a very low-budget film with a cast you have never heard of but a premise and script that were so well executed that this movie blew my mind! The panic and anxiety of the characters as they try to understand what is happening around them is told with such brilliance that the audience is lost, intrigued, overwhelmed, and bought in all at the same time. I'm telling you - watch this movie!
A group of friends in LA come together for a dinner party on the same night as a comet is going to be passing close to Earth. Warned of potentially odd events, the group is bemused by the loss of phone signals, and the occasional cracked handset, but a little more freaked out by the loss of power to pretty much the entire neighborhood. One of the group, Hugh, has a brother who works in the field of astrophysics and had suggested weirdness may occur – so Hugh and Amir head out to the only house in the area they can see with power, hoping to find a working telephone to contact him on. However, while they are out, other weirdness starts to occur.
Several years since it was made, this very low budget film arrives in the UK with only a few screenings in London that I know of. I had never heard about it till I saw some positive reviews in the paper, and reading about it afterwards (as you will) I learnt that it was shot in only 5 nights pretty much using the director's own front room as the set. This does show in the final film – not that it is cheaply made, but that it is a sci-fi where the ideas are the thing rather than big special effects or anything like this. It is said that the best sci- fi are about ideas and I would say this is often the case, when they are done well; fortunately Coherence is a film that (mostly) does it well.
Not to say much, but there are elements here that will be familiar to anyone who has seen time-travel films with alternate versions, or anything in Twilight Zone/Outer Limits involving alternate universes. Going online you will find lots of discussions about the film including a great thread here on IMDb where someone has broken down the entire film into diagram showing all the time-lines in more detail than I would guess even the makers ever did; however this is not to say that the film cannot be enjoy at a more reasonable level. I found it very nicely delivered so that we are pretty much our group the whole time in terms of their understanding of events – sometimes I was behind the plot, sometimes a little ahead of it, but mostly it kept me engaged and keen to see what happened. A few jump scares and loud noises are used to perhaps raise tension artificially early on, but otherwise the film manages to use the closed ___location and small group to increase tension and fear of the unknown throughout, making it enjoyable.
As an idea it is not perfect and you will find flaws if you pull at the edges, however I found it satisfyingly constructed and delivered. Some have complained about the camera-work and to a point I can understand the question as to why it needed to move around so much in a comparatively static area; however I found that to a point it helped put me in the room with the characters. This doesn't totally excuse some of the more amateur aspects of the look of the film, with so-so lighting and changeable color – although a perhaps accidental impact of this is that it also made me question where I was in the film. I was a bit surprised to see some complain about the acting, because actually I thought the unknown cast was very good. I bought into them as a dinner party group of artists and Los Angeles successes, and I thought they stuck well with their characters even as odd things happen; okay none of them coped well with some of the clunkier moments (the book was not the best way to bring exposition into the film) but otherwise they worked well.
Coherence is not as good as you have heard, but it is a very enjoyable film nonetheless – I think part of the high praise it receives is that it is a low-budget film that delivers much more than most viewers would expect. I found it mostly cleverly written and well delivered to draw the viewer in, give plenty of mystery and tension, and generally satisfy throughout and at the end. The low- budget nature of it does show, and the writing is not as perfect as it appears, but for 90 minutes I really enjoyed it and appreciated how engaged I was by what it was doing.
Several years since it was made, this very low budget film arrives in the UK with only a few screenings in London that I know of. I had never heard about it till I saw some positive reviews in the paper, and reading about it afterwards (as you will) I learnt that it was shot in only 5 nights pretty much using the director's own front room as the set. This does show in the final film – not that it is cheaply made, but that it is a sci-fi where the ideas are the thing rather than big special effects or anything like this. It is said that the best sci- fi are about ideas and I would say this is often the case, when they are done well; fortunately Coherence is a film that (mostly) does it well.
Not to say much, but there are elements here that will be familiar to anyone who has seen time-travel films with alternate versions, or anything in Twilight Zone/Outer Limits involving alternate universes. Going online you will find lots of discussions about the film including a great thread here on IMDb where someone has broken down the entire film into diagram showing all the time-lines in more detail than I would guess even the makers ever did; however this is not to say that the film cannot be enjoy at a more reasonable level. I found it very nicely delivered so that we are pretty much our group the whole time in terms of their understanding of events – sometimes I was behind the plot, sometimes a little ahead of it, but mostly it kept me engaged and keen to see what happened. A few jump scares and loud noises are used to perhaps raise tension artificially early on, but otherwise the film manages to use the closed ___location and small group to increase tension and fear of the unknown throughout, making it enjoyable.
As an idea it is not perfect and you will find flaws if you pull at the edges, however I found it satisfyingly constructed and delivered. Some have complained about the camera-work and to a point I can understand the question as to why it needed to move around so much in a comparatively static area; however I found that to a point it helped put me in the room with the characters. This doesn't totally excuse some of the more amateur aspects of the look of the film, with so-so lighting and changeable color – although a perhaps accidental impact of this is that it also made me question where I was in the film. I was a bit surprised to see some complain about the acting, because actually I thought the unknown cast was very good. I bought into them as a dinner party group of artists and Los Angeles successes, and I thought they stuck well with their characters even as odd things happen; okay none of them coped well with some of the clunkier moments (the book was not the best way to bring exposition into the film) but otherwise they worked well.
Coherence is not as good as you have heard, but it is a very enjoyable film nonetheless – I think part of the high praise it receives is that it is a low-budget film that delivers much more than most viewers would expect. I found it mostly cleverly written and well delivered to draw the viewer in, give plenty of mystery and tension, and generally satisfy throughout and at the end. The low- budget nature of it does show, and the writing is not as perfect as it appears, but for 90 minutes I really enjoyed it and appreciated how engaged I was by what it was doing.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाRelying on a low budget of $50K, the movie was shot over five nights in a single ___location with dialogue that was largely improvised.
- गूफ़(at around 7 mins) Right after Hugh asks everyone at the table about their phone reception but before he starts talking about the comet from the 1930s there is a brief shot of Lee saying something. A cameraman can be seen crouching behind the sofa in the living room to the left of Lee's head..
- कनेक्शनFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Alternate Realities in Movies (2015)
- साउंडट्रैकGalaxies
Written and Performed by Laura Veirs
Courtesy Nonesuch Records
By Arrangement with Warner Music Group Film & TV Licensing
Published by Freak Off The Leash Publishing (BMI)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइटें
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Coherence: Hiện Tượng Siêu Nhiên
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $50,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $1,02,617
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $17,000
- 22 जून 2014
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $1,39,745
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 29 मिनट
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.35 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें
