VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,9/10
3168
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaCharlie is an overworked labourer at a film studio who helps a young woman find work even while his coworkers strike against his tyrannical boss.Charlie is an overworked labourer at a film studio who helps a young woman find work even while his coworkers strike against his tyrannical boss.Charlie is an overworked labourer at a film studio who helps a young woman find work even while his coworkers strike against his tyrannical boss.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Albert Austin
- Stagehand
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- …
Lloyd Bacon
- Director of Comedy Film
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- …
Henry Bergman
- Director of History Film
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Leota Bryan
- Actress
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Frank J. Coleman
- Assistant Director
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
James T. Kelley
- Stagehand
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- …
Charlotte Mineau
- Actress
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Wesley Ruggles
- Actor
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Recensioni in evidenza
Charlie Chaplin sometimes repeated himself when it came to ideas for his comedy shorts, but only when his skill and technique had improved significantly in the meantime. Behind the Screen treads similar ground to Dough and Dynamite (made at Keystone) and His New Job (made at Essanay), being a comical expose on the film-making process itself, but it demonstrates all the development his style had made since those older pictures.
One major difference is the audacity and satiric bite of Chaplin's comedy by this point. Unlike the earlier examples, Behind the Screen bases most of its jokes on the artificiality of cinema, with "marble" pillars being shifted by hand, an "invisible" trapdoor that causes mayhem, and eventually the dramatic department having its dignity invaded by errant custard pies from a comedy set. He also has a sly dig at pompous directors and lazy stagehands. All this from an era before the majority of people in the audience wouldn't have really known exactly what went on behind the cameras. Still there is enough broad slapstick here to entertain the viewers who don't get the in-jokes.
Chaplin's management of the comedy is also now incredibly refined and to-the-point. In the earliest scenes, he shows how he can make himself the centre of attention without necessarily being in the foreground. Whilst everyone else on the set stays fairly still, Charlie bustles about all over the place leaving chaos in his wake. It's funnier this way because we see the little tramp upsetting the order of his environment.
The comedian had by now also accumulated a regular crew of supporting players – comic actors who were more buffoonish and ridiculous than funny in their own right, thus providing suitable antagonists for the little tramp. Eric Campbell is as usual the burly bully – the tyrant of a small pond who it is satisfying to see knocked down. Henry Bergman, in only his second of what would be many appearances with Chaplin is the perfect awkward fat man. He must have been a real find, and Charlie seems to take every opportunity to knock him down to get that undignified and helpless flailing of arms and legs that Bergman was the master of. And of course he now has Edna Purviance – by now often the only one allowed to be a completely straight actress. Her features are too feminine to be a convincing tomboy, but at least she gets the chance to be involved in some of the comedic action this time round.
Which leaves me only to give out the all-important statistic –
Number of kicks up the arse: 7 (5 for, 2 against)
One major difference is the audacity and satiric bite of Chaplin's comedy by this point. Unlike the earlier examples, Behind the Screen bases most of its jokes on the artificiality of cinema, with "marble" pillars being shifted by hand, an "invisible" trapdoor that causes mayhem, and eventually the dramatic department having its dignity invaded by errant custard pies from a comedy set. He also has a sly dig at pompous directors and lazy stagehands. All this from an era before the majority of people in the audience wouldn't have really known exactly what went on behind the cameras. Still there is enough broad slapstick here to entertain the viewers who don't get the in-jokes.
Chaplin's management of the comedy is also now incredibly refined and to-the-point. In the earliest scenes, he shows how he can make himself the centre of attention without necessarily being in the foreground. Whilst everyone else on the set stays fairly still, Charlie bustles about all over the place leaving chaos in his wake. It's funnier this way because we see the little tramp upsetting the order of his environment.
The comedian had by now also accumulated a regular crew of supporting players – comic actors who were more buffoonish and ridiculous than funny in their own right, thus providing suitable antagonists for the little tramp. Eric Campbell is as usual the burly bully – the tyrant of a small pond who it is satisfying to see knocked down. Henry Bergman, in only his second of what would be many appearances with Chaplin is the perfect awkward fat man. He must have been a real find, and Charlie seems to take every opportunity to knock him down to get that undignified and helpless flailing of arms and legs that Bergman was the master of. And of course he now has Edna Purviance – by now often the only one allowed to be a completely straight actress. Her features are too feminine to be a convincing tomboy, but at least she gets the chance to be involved in some of the comedic action this time round.
Which leaves me only to give out the all-important statistic –
Number of kicks up the arse: 7 (5 for, 2 against)
Charlie has various misadventures while working in the property department of a movie studio. For some reason, this film turned out to be the last of Chaplin's twelve Mutual shorts that I saw. I really looked forward to seeing it, thinking that Charlie would make the most of the studio ___location.
Sadly, if only because of my sense of anticipation, I was a bit disappointed. I didn't find it as funny as the bulk of the other Mutual shorts. Despite a ___location rich in potential, I found the funniest moments in this film to be some of the smallest like Charlie trying to steal bites from Albert Austin's lunch. Still, the film retains interest as a behind the screen view of motion picture production circa 1916. (A superior and more concise view of the world of producing silent films can be found in 'Singing in the Rain' as Gene Kelly walks through a silent studio with the head of the studio.) To me, the most interesting thing about this film is Chaplin's hostile attitude toward the striking union workers. If he had made this film later in his career, the radical unionists might have been the good guys!
Sadly, if only because of my sense of anticipation, I was a bit disappointed. I didn't find it as funny as the bulk of the other Mutual shorts. Despite a ___location rich in potential, I found the funniest moments in this film to be some of the smallest like Charlie trying to steal bites from Albert Austin's lunch. Still, the film retains interest as a behind the screen view of motion picture production circa 1916. (A superior and more concise view of the world of producing silent films can be found in 'Singing in the Rain' as Gene Kelly walks through a silent studio with the head of the studio.) To me, the most interesting thing about this film is Chaplin's hostile attitude toward the striking union workers. If he had made this film later in his career, the radical unionists might have been the good guys!
Behind the Screen stars Charlie Chaplin as a stagehand on a movie set. Chaplin is overworked and under-appreciated and his boss (Eric Campbell) spends most of the time asleep, leaving Chaplin to do the heavy lifting. Meanwhile a young woman (Edna Purviance) is trying to get her big break as an actress but is turned down so dresses up as a male stagehand in order to have at least some involvement in the movies. At the same time the fellow stagehands go on strike for being woken up by a studio boss and plot their revenge
This isn't one of the funniest Mutual shorts but it certainly has one of the better plots. It's multi layered and features side plot as well as the main narrative. It is also an opportunity to see behind the scenes of an early movie set in much the same way as His New Job, Chaplin's first film for Essanay a year earlier. What the film is most famous for now though is its forthright joke about homosexuality, a subject which was barely mentioned in cinema for another fifty years.
The scene in question comes late on when Chaplin discovers that the new stagehand is actually a woman. In a cute scene, Chaplin sneaks a couple of pecks on the lips. The start of a romantic relationship is interrupted though by the appearance of Eric Campbell who not knowing Edna Purviance is a woman, believes the two hands to be gay men. He starts prancing around in an effeminate way which today feels quite offensive. The fact that homosexuality was even mentioned though, no matter how insignificantly, was very bold. The same scene also features probably the defining image of the film, Chaplin's and Purviance's faces squished together, looking forward towards the camera, Chaplin with a trademark cheeky grin.
In terms of comedy, the film is a little short. There are of course funny moments which include a use of a trap door and a pie throwing finale. For me the funniest scene came when the stagehands were eating lunch. Chaplin was sat next to a man eating onions and to escape the smell put on a knights helmet, lifting the visor briefly to stuff bread into his mouth. During the same meal Chaplin tries to steal the meat which the same man is eating and when discovered, pretends to be a begging dog. There is plenty of slapstick to be found here also with large props producing most of the laughs. One fantastic act sees Chaplin pick up about eleven chairs and sling each one over his arm, giving him the appearance of a hedgehog or porcupine. This isn't enough for the poor stagehand as in his other arm he also carries a prop piano. It's very clever and looks incredibly difficult. The scene felt familiar to me but I don't know if that's because Chaplin repeated the stunt for a later film or because I've seen that clip before.
One interesting thing about Behind the Screen is getting a glimpse of an old movie set. A surprising aspect of this is finding two separate productions sharing the same stage. As noise made little difference to what the final picture looked like it was possible to have multiple movies being filmed in close proximity. Here Chaplin works on a set of what appears to be a medieval palace which is right next to a farcical comedy set in a police station. As you can probably guess, Chaplin ends up interrupting both at various times before completely destroying both towards the end. The final shot itself is also surprising in its violence. Although no blood, body parts or death was seen, it was still not what I was expecting to end a short comedy.
www.attheback.blogspot.com
The scene in question comes late on when Chaplin discovers that the new stagehand is actually a woman. In a cute scene, Chaplin sneaks a couple of pecks on the lips. The start of a romantic relationship is interrupted though by the appearance of Eric Campbell who not knowing Edna Purviance is a woman, believes the two hands to be gay men. He starts prancing around in an effeminate way which today feels quite offensive. The fact that homosexuality was even mentioned though, no matter how insignificantly, was very bold. The same scene also features probably the defining image of the film, Chaplin's and Purviance's faces squished together, looking forward towards the camera, Chaplin with a trademark cheeky grin.
In terms of comedy, the film is a little short. There are of course funny moments which include a use of a trap door and a pie throwing finale. For me the funniest scene came when the stagehands were eating lunch. Chaplin was sat next to a man eating onions and to escape the smell put on a knights helmet, lifting the visor briefly to stuff bread into his mouth. During the same meal Chaplin tries to steal the meat which the same man is eating and when discovered, pretends to be a begging dog. There is plenty of slapstick to be found here also with large props producing most of the laughs. One fantastic act sees Chaplin pick up about eleven chairs and sling each one over his arm, giving him the appearance of a hedgehog or porcupine. This isn't enough for the poor stagehand as in his other arm he also carries a prop piano. It's very clever and looks incredibly difficult. The scene felt familiar to me but I don't know if that's because Chaplin repeated the stunt for a later film or because I've seen that clip before.
One interesting thing about Behind the Screen is getting a glimpse of an old movie set. A surprising aspect of this is finding two separate productions sharing the same stage. As noise made little difference to what the final picture looked like it was possible to have multiple movies being filmed in close proximity. Here Chaplin works on a set of what appears to be a medieval palace which is right next to a farcical comedy set in a police station. As you can probably guess, Chaplin ends up interrupting both at various times before completely destroying both towards the end. The final shot itself is also surprising in its violence. Although no blood, body parts or death was seen, it was still not what I was expecting to end a short comedy.
www.attheback.blogspot.com
Am a big fan of Charlie Chaplin, have been for over a decade now. Many films and shorts of his are very good to masterpiece, and like many others consider him a comedy genius and one of film's most important and influential directors.
From his post-Essanay period after leaving Keystone, 'Behind the Screen' is not one of his very best but is one of his best early efforts and among the better short films of his. It shows a noticeable step up in quality though from his Keystone period, where he was still evolving and in the infancy of his long career, from 1914, The Essanay and Mutual periods were something of Chaplin's adolescence period where his style had been found and starting to settle. Something that can be seen in the more than worthwhile 'Behind the Screen'.
The story is more discernible than usual and is never dull, in fact it is quite eventful without being too busy. The romance is sweet enough and the chemistry is definitely there, part of me felt though that it was not needed.
On the other hand, 'Behind the Screen' looks pretty good, not incredible but it was obvious that Chaplin was taking more time with his work and not churning out countless shorts in the same year of very variable success like he did with Keystone. Appreciate the importance of his Keystone period and there is some good stuff he did there, but the more mature and careful quality seen here and later on is obvious.
While not one of his most hilarious or touching, 'Behind the Screen' is still very funny with some clever, entertaining and well-timed slapstick, didn't mind that the pathos wasn't there as it was not the right kind of story. It moves quickly and there is no dullness in sight. The ending is one of the best and funniest ones of Chaplin's early work.
Chaplin directs more than competently, if not quite cinematic genius standard yet. He also, as usual, gives an amusing and expressive performance and at clear ease with the physicality of the role. The supporting cast acquit themselves well, particularly Eric Campbell. Edna Purviance is charming and her chemistry with Chaplin is beautiful, even if it did feel she was there to provide the "obligatory" love interest.
Overall, very enjoyable. 8/10 Bethany Cox
From his post-Essanay period after leaving Keystone, 'Behind the Screen' is not one of his very best but is one of his best early efforts and among the better short films of his. It shows a noticeable step up in quality though from his Keystone period, where he was still evolving and in the infancy of his long career, from 1914, The Essanay and Mutual periods were something of Chaplin's adolescence period where his style had been found and starting to settle. Something that can be seen in the more than worthwhile 'Behind the Screen'.
The story is more discernible than usual and is never dull, in fact it is quite eventful without being too busy. The romance is sweet enough and the chemistry is definitely there, part of me felt though that it was not needed.
On the other hand, 'Behind the Screen' looks pretty good, not incredible but it was obvious that Chaplin was taking more time with his work and not churning out countless shorts in the same year of very variable success like he did with Keystone. Appreciate the importance of his Keystone period and there is some good stuff he did there, but the more mature and careful quality seen here and later on is obvious.
While not one of his most hilarious or touching, 'Behind the Screen' is still very funny with some clever, entertaining and well-timed slapstick, didn't mind that the pathos wasn't there as it was not the right kind of story. It moves quickly and there is no dullness in sight. The ending is one of the best and funniest ones of Chaplin's early work.
Chaplin directs more than competently, if not quite cinematic genius standard yet. He also, as usual, gives an amusing and expressive performance and at clear ease with the physicality of the role. The supporting cast acquit themselves well, particularly Eric Campbell. Edna Purviance is charming and her chemistry with Chaplin is beautiful, even if it did feel she was there to provide the "obligatory" love interest.
Overall, very enjoyable. 8/10 Bethany Cox
BEHIND THE SCREEN (Mutual Studios, 1916), Written and Directed by Charlie Chaplin, stars the legendary comedian with a new profession of employment, that of a stagehand at a movie set where everything goes wrong, thanks to you know who. Produced more in the Mack Sennett slapstick tradition where gags are essence over story, Chaplin's eighth comedy short for the Mutual Company does have enough comedy material to go around for its twenty minutes. Edna Purviance, Chaplin's most frequent co-star, returns, as does his most notable advisory, the giant size Eric Campbell, sans beard. For a change from their previous efforts, Chaplin and Campbell assume character names best describing their physical beings, David and Goliath. Though no such antics of David and Goliath can be found in the Bible, this is the Bible according to Chaplin.
The slight story set in a single day revolves around a stagehand named David (Charlie Chaplin), working as an assistant under Goliath (Eric Campbell). For the most part, David does all the work, ranging from carrying a dozen chairs at one time to moving heavy props while Goliath sits back, smoking his cigar, eating a dozen pies at once and getting credit for his partner's work. In fact, whenever David takes time to rest, he's accused of loafing by one of the bosses. After the workers go on strike for being awaken after having lunch, David and Goliath remain loyal to their jobs. Also in the studio is a young hopeful (Edna Purviance), wanting to become an actress. Unable to become one, she disguises herself as a carpenter instead. Further confusion arises as the strikers plot to disrupt film production, unaware that David is doing so in his own unintentional way.
BEHIND THE SCREEN is one of those little comedies that needs to be seen more than once to fully appreciate the material provided, ranging from running gags of falling through trap doors to pie throwing on the set. As usual, Chaplin and Campbell make a wonderful pair of opposites: Chaplin being a work slave; Campbell seated, relaxing, snoozing while "supervising." The lunch break sequence has Goliath eating his large assortment of pies while David sneaks in his bites from a fellow worker's (Albert Austin) meal. Although Chaplin has played "fag" on screen in other comedies, this time he passes on the big moment to Eric, and hilariously so, after mistaking Charlie's encounter with the "male" carpenter, Edna. Purviance, whose character in Mary Pickford-type appearance, is introduced in the very first scene asking a director, "Can I be an actress, please?" actually has little to do with the plot until the film's second half. The opening scenes belong to Charlie and Eric on their usual day of work on the movie set, with Charlie upsetting things as the director (Henry Bergman) attempts the impossible, getting his movie finished on schedule.
Music accompaniment differs from various prints from BEHIND THE SCREEN, ranging from piano, orchestration or no scoring at all. Most circulated copies that appeared on public television in the sixties and seventies consisted of ragtime music and sound effects lifted from 1930s reissues. Available on video cassette dating back to the 1980s, and later onto the DVD format, BEHIND THE SCREEN is also one of the many Chaplin short comedies that turns up occasionally on Turner Classic Movies (TCM premiere: December 6, 1999). Aside from the comedy interludes, BEHIND THE SCREEN offers a look back at movie directing back in the early days of motion picture making and the type of humor most commonly found that had audiences in 1916 roaring with laughter, forgetting what the plot is all about in the first place. Next Chaplin Mutual short: THE RINK (1916). (***)
The slight story set in a single day revolves around a stagehand named David (Charlie Chaplin), working as an assistant under Goliath (Eric Campbell). For the most part, David does all the work, ranging from carrying a dozen chairs at one time to moving heavy props while Goliath sits back, smoking his cigar, eating a dozen pies at once and getting credit for his partner's work. In fact, whenever David takes time to rest, he's accused of loafing by one of the bosses. After the workers go on strike for being awaken after having lunch, David and Goliath remain loyal to their jobs. Also in the studio is a young hopeful (Edna Purviance), wanting to become an actress. Unable to become one, she disguises herself as a carpenter instead. Further confusion arises as the strikers plot to disrupt film production, unaware that David is doing so in his own unintentional way.
BEHIND THE SCREEN is one of those little comedies that needs to be seen more than once to fully appreciate the material provided, ranging from running gags of falling through trap doors to pie throwing on the set. As usual, Chaplin and Campbell make a wonderful pair of opposites: Chaplin being a work slave; Campbell seated, relaxing, snoozing while "supervising." The lunch break sequence has Goliath eating his large assortment of pies while David sneaks in his bites from a fellow worker's (Albert Austin) meal. Although Chaplin has played "fag" on screen in other comedies, this time he passes on the big moment to Eric, and hilariously so, after mistaking Charlie's encounter with the "male" carpenter, Edna. Purviance, whose character in Mary Pickford-type appearance, is introduced in the very first scene asking a director, "Can I be an actress, please?" actually has little to do with the plot until the film's second half. The opening scenes belong to Charlie and Eric on their usual day of work on the movie set, with Charlie upsetting things as the director (Henry Bergman) attempts the impossible, getting his movie finished on schedule.
Music accompaniment differs from various prints from BEHIND THE SCREEN, ranging from piano, orchestration or no scoring at all. Most circulated copies that appeared on public television in the sixties and seventies consisted of ragtime music and sound effects lifted from 1930s reissues. Available on video cassette dating back to the 1980s, and later onto the DVD format, BEHIND THE SCREEN is also one of the many Chaplin short comedies that turns up occasionally on Turner Classic Movies (TCM premiere: December 6, 1999). Aside from the comedy interludes, BEHIND THE SCREEN offers a look back at movie directing back in the early days of motion picture making and the type of humor most commonly found that had audiences in 1916 roaring with laughter, forgetting what the plot is all about in the first place. Next Chaplin Mutual short: THE RINK (1916). (***)
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThis is one of the few films in which Charles Chaplin's character (David) gets a name other than "Charlie" or a description like "The Tramp". Only in his last sound films does he portray people with a full name.
- Versioni alternativeKino International distributes a set of videos containing all the 12 Mutual short films made by Chaplin in 1915 - 1917. They are presented by David Shepard, who copyrighted the versions in 1984, and has a music soundtrack composed and performed by Michael Mortilla who copyrighted his score in 1989. The running time of this film is 23 minutes.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Unknown Chaplin: My Happiest Years (1983)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione30 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.33 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti

Divario superiore
By what name was Charlot macchinista (1916) officially released in Canada in English?
Rispondi