VALUTAZIONE IMDb
3,1/10
4265
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA group of strangers trapped in a time warp house where a terrible event transpired exactly 100 years prior.A group of strangers trapped in a time warp house where a terrible event transpired exactly 100 years prior.A group of strangers trapped in a time warp house where a terrible event transpired exactly 100 years prior.
Corey Reilly
- Sean McKnight
- (as Corey Riley)
Eric Fischer
- Driver
- (as Eric Mark Fischer)
Recensioni in evidenza
"Bellow Seven" (2012) is a Horror Thriller which has as the most famous actors in it Vig Rhames and Val Kilmer. The film deals with the history of a house, where in 1911 a family was murdered, and that 100 years later, after an accident, some people get stuck in it, along with a strange man who takes care of the house (Rhames).
Frankly speaking, this is one of the worst movies in every way I've ever seen: the story is very weak, and is extremely cliché, and has many holes in the narrative, which is inconsistent and without any interesting point.
The footage is bad, even renting a house with theoretically more than 100 years, it has everything brand-new, even the infrastructure of a new home, with nothing of dust or cobwebs, even in places that would be less care of.
Otherwise, besides a gas station and a forest (well cared for that matter), has no other locations. Special effects in just a few seconds in the final minutes (and even they were poorly made).
The actions and roles are some of the worst I've ever seen: the best of all, in a regular performance is Vig Rhames, and Val Kilmer (who I no longer consider a good actor), is terrible, with a brief paper and without a definite personality (from a rude guy to a mentally ill one from nothing). The others actors / characters are meaningless and horrible.
The music and sound effects are adequate, nothing more.
In total is a poor film, not even a class B one, a total loss of 1 and a half hour of my life... this is really a movie that should stay 7 feet below the ground. My score: 2.0 / 10.0.
Frankly speaking, this is one of the worst movies in every way I've ever seen: the story is very weak, and is extremely cliché, and has many holes in the narrative, which is inconsistent and without any interesting point.
The footage is bad, even renting a house with theoretically more than 100 years, it has everything brand-new, even the infrastructure of a new home, with nothing of dust or cobwebs, even in places that would be less care of.
Otherwise, besides a gas station and a forest (well cared for that matter), has no other locations. Special effects in just a few seconds in the final minutes (and even they were poorly made).
The actions and roles are some of the worst I've ever seen: the best of all, in a regular performance is Vig Rhames, and Val Kilmer (who I no longer consider a good actor), is terrible, with a brief paper and without a definite personality (from a rude guy to a mentally ill one from nothing). The others actors / characters are meaningless and horrible.
The music and sound effects are adequate, nothing more.
In total is a poor film, not even a class B one, a total loss of 1 and a half hour of my life... this is really a movie that should stay 7 feet below the ground. My score: 2.0 / 10.0.
This was by far the worst thriller I have ever seen. Lousy acting, cinematography and storyline. I wonder how much this film cost to produce and whether they actually expected it to be a successful picture at the box office. Complete let-down considering the actors cast and it is now obvious tho was purely a financial thing for all of them. Does anyone know of this director and any of their previous work? Would be interesting to do some sort of comparison. I'm just so astonished that this sort of crap gets given the time of day at the box office. Its far below D grade in terms of quality. I suggest we all go and watch The Green Mile or Inception and relax knowing that there is some sort of talent in this world. Its almost as if a group of guys sat around a table and thought "now how can we waste some money...?" My 10 year old sister makes better films on Viddy. Waste of time, I rate it 0/10.
When it comes to movies I always have an open mind and enjoy losing myself in the plot but when I say this movie is bad, I mean this movie is bad. It is so bad that I decided to share my opinion and feel it's my duty to share it so that I might be able to help those that have not watched this yet, save their time and energy and dedicate it to something else....ANYTHING else.
The acting was laughable for most of the cast with the exception of Goss, Kilmer and a few others. I honestly thought that I was going insane because I couldn't accept that a movie as bad as this had actually been made.
I am not even making sense as I type this because I can't even express or communicate in proper English and Grammar just how dreadful this movie is.
In summary......for the love of all that is good and pure in this world....don't watch this movie.
The acting was laughable for most of the cast with the exception of Goss, Kilmer and a few others. I honestly thought that I was going insane because I couldn't accept that a movie as bad as this had actually been made.
I am not even making sense as I type this because I can't even express or communicate in proper English and Grammar just how dreadful this movie is.
In summary......for the love of all that is good and pure in this world....don't watch this movie.
In the past few years when you see ether Val Kilmer, or Ving Rhames in the movie it may be more than questionable. The copy I watched had very bad sound mixing. The sound of the storm and rain falling would drowned out the dialog allot of the time.
Val Kilmer, has seen much better days in his day, this is not "Tombstone" for sure
This is one of those movies. B-movie, weak story, holes in the plot corny lines. I did get all the way through it though......... barely. If your paying to see this, I wouldn't, if not its a OK way to kill some time!
Val Kilmer, has seen much better days in his day, this is not "Tombstone" for sure
This is one of those movies. B-movie, weak story, holes in the plot corny lines. I did get all the way through it though......... barely. If your paying to see this, I wouldn't, if not its a OK way to kill some time!
This movie was terrible. From very bad acting to implausible situations, and yes I realize that the entire movie is an implausible situation. What I am talking about are the characters acting completely irrational in certain situations. People just don't do what the characters did, especially if you have ever seen a horror movie in your life.
I too found the sound to be terrible. Storm completely drowns out the dialog at points in this movie.
I love "B" movies and I will gladly waste time on a less that stellar movie, but I regret wasting my time on this one. To call this a "B" movie is to elevate it to a position it does not deserve.
IMHO, save your money, save your time and do not bother with this one. A real stinker.
I too found the sound to be terrible. Storm completely drowns out the dialog at points in this movie.
I love "B" movies and I will gladly waste time on a less that stellar movie, but I regret wasting my time on this one. To call this a "B" movie is to elevate it to a position it does not deserve.
IMHO, save your money, save your time and do not bother with this one. A real stinker.
Lo sapevi?
- BlooperThe opening scenes, which took place in 1911 as correlated to newspaper snapshots during the opening credits showed modern plastic/toggle-style light switches.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is 7 Below?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 6.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 85.226 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 32 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
