VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,7/10
1501
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Un'azienda di wellness incentrata sulla sessualità acquista notorietà e aderenti per la pratica di "meditazione orgasmica" fino a quando alcuni iscritti muovono inquietanti accuse.Un'azienda di wellness incentrata sulla sessualità acquista notorietà e aderenti per la pratica di "meditazione orgasmica" fino a quando alcuni iscritti muovono inquietanti accuse.Un'azienda di wellness incentrata sulla sessualità acquista notorietà e aderenti per la pratica di "meditazione orgasmica" fino a quando alcuni iscritti muovono inquietanti accuse.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Recensioni in evidenza
As with many Netflix documentaries of late, the biggest flaw with this one is creating it too early. There are no conclusions at the end, no satisfying ending, simply "this is still ongoing." At least with The Tinder Swindler, the guy becomes destitute (although not for long before he's at it again) but at least it was something.
They do a good job in describing how the woman who created it ended up taking ideas from L Ron Hubbard and other people who created successful cults - I think the biggest difference is she after more than money; she was the epitome of "blame the victim" when it came to sex.
The line I found the most interesting (paraphrasing): "I don't know why people always say if women ran the world everything would be great, just look at OneTaste."
They do a good job in describing how the woman who created it ended up taking ideas from L Ron Hubbard and other people who created successful cults - I think the biggest difference is she after more than money; she was the epitome of "blame the victim" when it came to sex.
The line I found the most interesting (paraphrasing): "I don't know why people always say if women ran the world everything would be great, just look at OneTaste."
This documentary did a good job of exposing a wolf in sheep's clothing, One Taste founder, Nicole Daedone. However, like with many "cult" documentaries that are in vogue, it ends with lazy tabloid "this could happen to anyone" scaremongering instead of doing the investigative journalism to expose the common threads that left the victims they interviewed more susceptible to falling prey to this type of brainwashing. In this case, the documentary could have explored our dismal sex education for women in particular, our cultural shaming of female sexuality, our epidemic of child sexual abuse in all sexes, and our failure to teach both trauma recovery and critical thinking skills. Some friends and I attended an introductory One Taste lecture describing the "Om" meditation in the late 2000's and because I had expert knowledge of my sexual response from a young age from women's health books and had training in critical thinking skills, I immediately recognized the cult tactics of groupthink and gaslighting--and I saw the glazed look in the women's eyes who were devotees. It was truly creepy.
Documentaries on cults should examine how our culture at large grooms people to be vulnerable. But every time we try to have that conversation, it's seen as "victim blaming" rather than what it really is...empowering to avoid victimization. Documentaries like this have a responsibility to look at the bigger picture, instead of just creating more fear about how any of us could be next which, in my experience, is not true.
Documentaries on cults should examine how our culture at large grooms people to be vulnerable. But every time we try to have that conversation, it's seen as "victim blaming" rather than what it really is...empowering to avoid victimization. Documentaries like this have a responsibility to look at the bigger picture, instead of just creating more fear about how any of us could be next which, in my experience, is not true.
No pun intended - the general idea does not sound bad ... at all. But as with everything (or almost everything I reckon), the more people get involved ... the messier it gets. Again, true for most things ... also while you may like it that way, let's be clear: things that (allegedly) happen here (or are talked about)? Not cool to say the least.
Question is, what is real? What actually happened? And what do we want to believe? Not everyone involved will talk and give their perspective - may sound guilty, but you can't talk about things others have done without making yourself vulnerable I reckon.
On the other hand, you may think when it comes to orgasm: isn't being vulnerable what it's all about? Well mostly I reckon. Now I would not say that this is meant to be erotic or enticing ... or made to arouse you (not judging if it does - well some of it). But more information would have been useful - more insight ... and more clarity ... not everything is the fault of the makers of this ... just saying what some viewers surely have felt watching this. It would be more enjoyable ... with certain aspects (no pun intended)
Question is, what is real? What actually happened? And what do we want to believe? Not everyone involved will talk and give their perspective - may sound guilty, but you can't talk about things others have done without making yourself vulnerable I reckon.
On the other hand, you may think when it comes to orgasm: isn't being vulnerable what it's all about? Well mostly I reckon. Now I would not say that this is meant to be erotic or enticing ... or made to arouse you (not judging if it does - well some of it). But more information would have been useful - more insight ... and more clarity ... not everything is the fault of the makers of this ... just saying what some viewers surely have felt watching this. It would be more enjoyable ... with certain aspects (no pun intended)
This documentary about Nicole Daedon and her OneTaste Company is interesting but completely misses the mark on its attempt to portray Daedon as a scammer and con artist. While there is clearly a cultish aspect of the personality and the work of Daedon it is not veiled. She is person that promotes female sexual empowerment and enlightenment through female orgasm. She also charges a lot of money for her programs. So what? The people that joined did so of their free will and were free to leave any time. Furthermore, it seems that the program was transparent in its focus on sexuality as a vehicle for self awareness. People's buyer's remorse or embarrassment over paying upwards of $30,000 doesn't;t make this a story of corruption or fraud. I thought the story is interesting but I felt like the documentarian was trying to manipulate the story.
One conclusion. Nicole Daedone is a villain. 'Orgasm Inc: The Story of OneTaste' only amplifies and retells the same old story. Anecdotes and details of events from victims' perspectives are surely important, but all things end there so soon rather than elaborating on the systematic strategies OneTaste used for luring the members in and locking them in. At the end, even though I feel really horrible to say this, I feel as if victims had their chances to get out. Traumatic stories former members tell scar me deeply, and I really feel for them. Then, there is nothing that this documentary can offer to wash it all, such as a solution or resolution. Those horrible stories are all there are to be left.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Orgasm Inc: The Story of OneTaste?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Orgasm Inc.: La historia de OneTaste
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 29 minuti
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti

Divario superiore
What was the official certification given to Orgasm Inc.: il caso OneTaste (2022) in Brazil?
Rispondi