Un informatore molto talentuoso ma socialmente alienato riceve l'incarico dal Management di provare il "Zero Theorem", secondo il quale l'universo si conclude con il nulla cosmico, rendendo ... Leggi tuttoUn informatore molto talentuoso ma socialmente alienato riceve l'incarico dal Management di provare il "Zero Theorem", secondo il quale l'universo si conclude con il nulla cosmico, rendendo così la vita priva di senso. Ma è al senso che l'uomo anela già.Un informatore molto talentuoso ma socialmente alienato riceve l'incarico dal Management di provare il "Zero Theorem", secondo il quale l'universo si conclude con il nulla cosmico, rendendo così la vita priva di senso. Ma è al senso che l'uomo anela già.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 2 vittorie e 7 candidature totali
- Old Homeless Man
- (as Rudi Rosenfeld)
Recensioni in evidenza
There are elements of David Cronenberg's Cosmopolis in Qohen's philosophical quest, in the oddball characters he meets along the way, and his perennial absence of feeling. And in the Zen imagery of a nude Waltz spiralling through the void, there's a bit of Darren Aronofsky's The Fountain. Both of those films were more coherent and emotionally engaging than The Zero Theorem, although Terry Gilliam's film grows on you, once you accept that it's not Brazil Part II. There are definite touches of Gilliam's 1985 masterpiece here, particularly the awkward marrying of archaic and ultra-modern technologies. But don't expect a script of Tom Stoppard wit, swerve, and clarity.
Waltz is a fantastic presence – which is necessary, because most of the story plays out in his home: an echochamber of a converted church, whose baptismal font now serves as a washing up bowl. We see him at work, attempting to order the universe via a 3D game block game, fighting against entropy; against the inevitable demise of conscious matter and with it the question: What does it all mean? The problem is, he's waiting for an answer. The very point is uncertainty, the propulsive force of our species.
Whether all this makes for a particularly cinematic experience, I'm not sure. The Cronenberg and Aronofsky films I mentioned were successful because, for all their vast questions, their focus was narrow and their plots simple. The Zero Theorem is at its best when at its least manic – perhaps, its least 'Gilliam-esque' – lost in the quiet intimacy between Qohen and Bainsley. Like Wes Anderson's latest, this feels like the film of an auteur fighting against two opposing impulses. The results, particularly when seen as a straightforward study of depression, are interesting, if not entirely successful.
But for the whole length of it we are convinced there will be some kind of redemption, some kind of explanation, some kind of reason to watch the damn film in the first place.
Most of it just seems to be ticking boxes for Terry. Awkward protagonist, dystopian future, love interest, people in silly costumes, lots of colours, steam-tech gear, and strange delivery-people.
Yeah and... yeah, where's the point, again? One bit of visual eye-candy I liked was the data-representation system, but I can't describe it here, for the sake of those who haven't seen the film yet.
Look, it's not a crap film, it's just not blindingly evocative and moving. It's certainly no Brazil even though it has things in common (and its a LOT more cheerful). It's no Fisher King. It's not even a Doctor Parnassus.
One purely for the fans I think.
Though Zero theorem is one of the weaker stories he has told. At the end of the movie the bad guy has to literally explain the movies plot in a monologue, that's how bad the plot is. Brazil or 12 monkeys never felt the need to explain their own plot; you got everything you need to know from actually watching the movie.
So yeah, if you are a die hard fan of Gilliam you should watch it, other wise watch Brazil or 12 Monkeys.
In this movie, Christoph Waltz plays a programmer trying to find out whether or not life has any meaning (hey, an indirect reference to Monty Python's movie). But the society that the programmer inhabits is what caught my eye. It looks like a cross between "Blade Runner" and "Brazil", with a little bit of "Minority Report". Advertisements follow people everywhere. How could anyone even think about life's meaning in this setting?
I actually wasn't as fond of this movie as I was of Gilliam's other movies. It was slower than most of his movies. Of course, one could argue that the movie's philosophical element required it to move slowly. Maybe so, but I still prefer Gilliam's other movies more. Maybe worth seeing once.
Here we struggle with the main character (wonderful played by Christoph Waltz) and his meaningless solitary existence hoping to get an answer by a higher power of what life is all about.
So can the hero find out the meaning of life or the absence of it? and will he be willing to sacrifice his potential joy and happiness in order to get that mysterious call. Well you will be the judge.
If you like this movie I also recommend PI by Aronofsky, Brazil, Blade runner, 1984, THX1138 among other great ones. Hopefully this movie will become a cult classic and show new directors that they don't require 100+ million dollars to make good sci-fi movies. Thanks and cheers to Gilliam for sticking for what he believes in and daring to tackle difficult philosophical questions and having that original fingerprint he stamps in all his great movies.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizIn order to select the locations, Terry Gilliam used Google Earth: "I'd got most of the locations sorted out by using Google Earth before I first went to Romania. This is how we do ___location scouting these days."
- BlooperWhen Qohen is sitting at his computer naked, he is wearing flesh colored underwear.
- Citazioni
Qohen Leth: Nothing adds up.
Joby: No. You've got it backwards, Qohen. Everything adds up to nothing, that's the point.
Qohen Leth: What's the point?
Joby: Exactly. What's the point of anything?
- Curiosità sui creditiIn memory of the great Richard D. Zanuck who kept the ball rolling.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Film '72: Episodio datato 5 marzo 2014 (2014)
- Colonne sonoreCreep
Written by Thom Yorke, Jonny Greenwood, Colin Greenwood, Ed O'Brien, Phil Selway, Albert Hammond and Mike Hazlewood
Performed by Karen Souza
I più visti
- How long is The Zero Theorem?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 8.500.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 257.706 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 83.803 USD
- 21 set 2014
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 1.486.506 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 47 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
