VALUTAZIONE IMDb
7,7/10
2263
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaScrutinized by comedians, Hardwick explores the Internet through clips and images, revealing its oddities.Scrutinized by comedians, Hardwick explores the Internet through clips and images, revealing its oddities.Scrutinized by comedians, Hardwick explores the Internet through clips and images, revealing its oddities.
- Vincitore di 2 Primetime Emmy
- 2 vittorie e 4 candidature totali
Sfoglia gli episodi
Recensioni in evidenza
Well, it seems that nearly everyone else who reviewed is trying to be just plain too serious about this show. Hardwick is super as a quick talking host with a great laugh and sense of what's totally absurd, off the wall, and nuts! If you rad his biography, you'll understand that Chris comes from a crazy personal place and survived. He has learned the value of humor and lots of silliness. The scoring system is meant to be just as crazy. Who cares who wins?! Jumping around with the random scores just adds to the unexpected. Afterall, comedic responses are best when spontaneous without explanation needed. Explaining a joke always ruins it! The comedians are often just as 'out there', but still makes everyone laugh even if they don't 'get it'! After a long day, it's the perfect show to just let go, relax with silliness. LOVE IT!!
...actually, nevermind this other commenter - they obviously have a problem with something that some people like to call "humor". The show if f**kin' hilarious and has won awards, but hey, it's not for everyone. If it was, it would be called America's Funniest Home Videos, and would thereby be relegated blah status.
Chris Hardwick for president! His charm, witt, and nerdom are powerful and had me instantly obsessed from the get. Add a slew of other insanely funny comedians and actors (some of my biggest idols included), add a dash of genius and well thought out theme of a fake game show with pointless points, and bam! You got yourself the most enjoyable thing I've EVER watched. Why they discontinued it, I don't know, but whatever the reason it wasn't good enough! Give it back!!!
I read the reviews of the people who hated this show and they all have a common thread, they all loved Tosh.0 . I am not going to disparage their opinions, they are entitled to have them heard, but I wanted to clarify why the rest of the viewing audience should tune in. The host, Chris's delivery is stellar. His comedic communication and ability to actually relate to the viewer is a skill set that is rarely seen on television. As far as the Internet being the source for riffing, it works well, it provides a constantly changing source of information to joke about which keeps the show fresh. This format also provides a platform for comedians, writers and actors to actually have fun, and it shows, the energy is infectious. Finally, after a crappy day of work and a crappier day of ingesting bilious news, this program provides a nice grounding base and a way to laugh before bed, which is priceless. Will there be the occasional show that misses? Of course, but those shows are still better than anything else on television.
Absolute garbage! Where is the comedy? Where is the game-show portion?
This has got to be the worst show on TV right now.
How drunk or high does one have to be to A: be in this 'game show'. B: come up with stupid answers that are not funny. C: be able to score said stupid answers.
Some reviewers said it's good exposure for the comedians... no it's not! It makes them look dumb, not funny, and most of all desperate.
This is the show you get on when you've reached the bottom of the barrel!
Had it been a panel where they just sit down and come up with stupid comments, it would be entertaining! But to add a nonsense scorekeeper to responses that no one has any clue how they are scored, is just plain stupid! Sure, it's not a real game, OK, so then it's not damn funny either, it's stupid!
WOW, the crap that networks fund is astonishing.
This has got to be the worst show on TV right now.
How drunk or high does one have to be to A: be in this 'game show'. B: come up with stupid answers that are not funny. C: be able to score said stupid answers.
Some reviewers said it's good exposure for the comedians... no it's not! It makes them look dumb, not funny, and most of all desperate.
This is the show you get on when you've reached the bottom of the barrel!
Had it been a panel where they just sit down and come up with stupid comments, it would be entertaining! But to add a nonsense scorekeeper to responses that no one has any clue how they are scored, is just plain stupid! Sure, it's not a real game, OK, so then it's not damn funny either, it's stupid!
WOW, the crap that networks fund is astonishing.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizDoug Benson has been a contestant on the show more than any other comic. As of August 2014 he has appeared on the show 10 times and won 6 of those times.
- ConnessioniEdited from Grano rosso sangue (1984)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How many seasons does @midnight have?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione30 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 16:9 HD
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
