Molteplici vite si intersecano all'indomani della violenta rapina di un professore di filosofia della Columbia University.Molteplici vite si intersecano all'indomani della violenta rapina di un professore di filosofia della Columbia University.Molteplici vite si intersecano all'indomani della violenta rapina di un professore di filosofia della Columbia University.
- Roger
- (as Phil Ettinger)
- Jeffrey
- (as Michael K. Williams)
Recensioni in evidenza
Although there were some minor editing hiccups, this story holds up fantastically as it documents the lives of different New Yorkers. The story gives food for thought and deserves a watch as it has clever dialogue, and authentic acting performances. Thankfully, as the plot got predictable, it made a left turn for a satisfying ending. This story was everything Crash (2004) wanted to be but better. It's also the most honest depiction of New York life I've seen in a long while. I wish this movie well in theaters!
Each character has their own story and most of them are unhappy, mentally fragile, or have fallen into the pit of substance abuse. Only one 'the professor' seem to be truly happy in his life and of course by movies end he suffers the most. We have seen other movies with this format where what appears to be people living separate lives eventually converge due to one event.
'Anesthesia' is an OK movie well acted and edited and scripted. The story will keep your interest but at movies end - that's it. It ends and you get the message. It's a take it or leave it flick for me!
Ok, so we have the intersecting story line. Not only is this getting tired but it is becoming the refuge of second rate ideas. Essentially a gimmick, and it is painfully just that here.
Then we have philosophy "lite", ie some Socratic musings smattered with a bit of plagiarism of Plutarch and a mention of August. Its undergrad "western philosophy 101" haphazardly superimposed over unimportant events and uninteresting people.
The kicker is the completely inappropriate apologia for predatory violence. Explain muggers who assault their victims, or rapists, or any other violent criminal as essentially no different than you or I, is just insulting. That is not a case of but the grace of god there go you or I, it is a case of a very small proportion of the population habitually committing predatory violence and choosing to permanently harm people
One detail that particularly irritated me was the lecturing manner - and content - of the supposed Columbia University philosophy professor. He addressed his class in a manner that no real lecturer would, speaking in over-written prose found only in bad novels - and poorer made-for-TV films. The subjects matter he seemed to cover was so eclectic and with such a tenuous connection to any school of philosophy that I wondered if the script writer was having a joke at the audience's - or academia's - expense.
The concept of one incident linking various disparate individuals, and thus illustrating aspects of life - or in this case New York city - is so over-used that it will now only succeed with a better than average script. Unfortunately, despite the reasonably capable cast, this was a forlorn exercise.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe film wasn't announced by trade publications until after college students spotted Kristen Stewart filming on their campus in New York City.
- Citazioni
Prof. Walter Zarrow: But then, what do all these thinkers we've examined this semester have in common? If we truly explore to find a common thread? At the outset of a century that would constitute the bloodiest in human history. Along with scientific and technological advancements that would literally make us like Gods. Even as we began to dismantle the very meaning of God. They ask, what is a life? Does to live any longer have a how? Does it any longer have a why? Against a backdrop of industrialization, people will contend with alienation, dislocation, population on a mass scale, and murder on a mass scale. They'll consider the constraints of truth. Whether metaphor or paradigm, with many concluding actual truth has never existed. A nexus in the great human saga, when we dared to trade the organizing bliss, of good and evil, right and wrong, as determined by a creator for other opiates: communism, socialism, capitalism, psychology, technology, any learnable system to replace what had begun to evaporate: the 20th century. My own. But also the one into which each of you was born. For many, an era of hope liberation, possibility. For others of abandonment and despair. A most human century in which we begin really to understand that Nietzsche was right: we are beautifully, finally, achingly, alone. In this void, philosophy at its worst becomes self-reflective, linguistic, semantic, relativism having rendered any discussion of right and wrong, good and evil, to be the quaint concerns of another age. At its most provocative, it asks other questions. Those concerned with locating our stranded selves, when meaning seems to have died, nothing less, in short, then 'why do we live at all?' and 'what makes us who we are?' They ask, 'what now?' And we're still asking it. What will fortify us as another century, your century, commences? Do we abandon finally the search for truths that seem ever more elusive, even silly to some? The ethical? The moral? The good? Principles that by definition can never be prove when so much now can be proved? Or is all this finally and forever pointless? Are we done? We can destroy cities, alter the planet irreversibly, speak instantaneously face-to-face from across the globe, create life where there was to be none, even while intoxicating ourselves with it all. And yet, how do we still seek purpose? And where do we hope to find it if we're so busy convincing ourselves there needn't be any? And so we wander, eyes closed to the dark, while technology, science, medicine and godlessness blaze illusions around us, with less to guide us now than ever, seemingly omnipotent, but more human and just as afraid. These quandaries do not end with this course in a week from today. They begin. And I certainly haven't taught these writers for 30 years just so you can drop references to existential thinkers and their antecedents at dinner parties. The crowd is untruth. In an era darkened by the false shade of imperviousness, you and those who pause to question, carry the light. It's been a wonderful 34 years. Let's not be strangers, either to one another, or more importantly, to everything we've learned from one another. May your best years be yet to come. And so for us all.
[all applauding]
Prof. Walter Zarrow: [all cheering] Thank you, thank you, thank you.
- Colonne sonoreTenderly
Performed by Bill Evans
Written By Walter Gross and Jack Lawrence
Used by Permission of Edwin H. Morris & Company,
A Division of MPL Music Publishing, Inc.,
and Range Road Music, Inc.
I più visti
- How long is Anesthesia?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 32.163 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 6747 USD
- 10 gen 2016
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 78.270 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 30 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
