VALUTAZIONE IMDb
3,5/10
1231
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Una squadra di ladri irrompe in una prigione messicana di massima sicurezza con un piano per rapinare il più famoso signore della droga. Pieno di azione, pistole fumanti, combattimenti e pol... Leggi tuttoUna squadra di ladri irrompe in una prigione messicana di massima sicurezza con un piano per rapinare il più famoso signore della droga. Pieno di azione, pistole fumanti, combattimenti e politici corrotti.Una squadra di ladri irrompe in una prigione messicana di massima sicurezza con un piano per rapinare il più famoso signore della droga. Pieno di azione, pistole fumanti, combattimenti e politici corrotti.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Fabián López
- Benny
- (as Fabian Lopez)
Eddie J. Fernandez
- Ramon
- (as Eddie Fernandez)
Recensioni in evidenza
The film is entertaining, but not exceptional in any particular ways.
The film is well acted, and it's shame it is sold as a big action set piece for Lundgren. It is more of suspense thriller. Lundgren play a reckless robber and does a good job. However the fight scene I found to be quite average, I have seen Lundgren do much better in recent years. There was something off and I can't quite put my finger on it. I have seen the director direct action and he is good and Lundgren is a seasoned vet. So I can't understand what happened.
The movie does have a solid script, the cast are uniformly good, well edited, lit, the sets are goods, and it moves.
For a Lundgren film, it is much superior compared to many of recent Lundgren outputs a lot less good compared to his recent gems.
The film is well acted, and it's shame it is sold as a big action set piece for Lundgren. It is more of suspense thriller. Lundgren play a reckless robber and does a good job. However the fight scene I found to be quite average, I have seen Lundgren do much better in recent years. There was something off and I can't quite put my finger on it. I have seen the director direct action and he is good and Lundgren is a seasoned vet. So I can't understand what happened.
The movie does have a solid script, the cast are uniformly good, well edited, lit, the sets are goods, and it moves.
For a Lundgren film, it is much superior compared to many of recent Lundgren outputs a lot less good compared to his recent gems.
Classic waste-timer action(??) movie, of US against mexican druglords....
If you cannot sleep, then give it a go....You would have probably forgotten it by the time you wake up!
I think 3.5/10 is more accurate but if I finish any of these below 4/10 movies on IMDB I round up
Personally, most things rated 3/10 or lower on IMDb I have probably turned off after 30 mins as they're unwatchable.
This film was not unwatchable, close but not. Sadly it's boring and very, very forgettable. I honestly can't remember how it started...
All of the actors looked bored here and it's a shame as its shot pretty well and a movie set in a prison should throw up some tension but it's all flat with bored performances
Even Dolph looks like he's bored here!
Shame as the ending could have been fun with a bit more of a build up.
I would not recommend this movie. Even Dolph fans should skip.
Personally, most things rated 3/10 or lower on IMDb I have probably turned off after 30 mins as they're unwatchable.
This film was not unwatchable, close but not. Sadly it's boring and very, very forgettable. I honestly can't remember how it started...
All of the actors looked bored here and it's a shame as its shot pretty well and a movie set in a prison should throw up some tension but it's all flat with bored performances
Even Dolph looks like he's bored here!
Shame as the ending could have been fun with a bit more of a build up.
I would not recommend this movie. Even Dolph fans should skip.
Did not expect much in the first place before watching 'Maximum Security'. As said with a few films reviewed recently, it sounded interesting, but it did look like a not very well made, ridiculous and by the numbers film with not particularly good actors, although Dolph Lundgren is watchable in other things.
Saw 'Maximum Security' anyway out of curiosity, being intrigued by the idea and having been a lot of low-budget films recently (most not very good to put it lightly). Seeing it, 'Maximum Security' turned out to be more or less, make that exactly even, what was expected. Except worse. It doesn't even start off well, not much grabs the attention. The film got even worse very quickly and never recovered or improved. Actually got pretty much worse as it progressed.
On a visual level, 'Maximum Security' looked shoddy. Drab and simplistic, with haphazard editing, far from slick photography and very artificial-looking effects
The sound is very poorly recorded (one doesn't expect a film from 2017 to sound like something from 50 years or so before), the music is one-note and repetitive and the direction has no sense of atmosphere or pacing, nothing to be thrilled by and nothing much engaging.
'Maximum Security's' script is awkward-sounding and ponderous, with lines that do make one cringe. A lot of it is gibberish and juvenile, with a stilted improvisatory feel that shouldn't have made it past draft stages.
On top of that, the story goes through the motions with no tension, suspense or thrills, a lot of intelligence-insulting ridiculousness, implausibility and pacing so dull that it makes a reasonably short length much longer. The action sequences are more preposterous and by the numbers than they are thrilling or fun, that is when they are used, for such a title, idea and cover 'Maximum Security' is very short on the quantity of the action. The terrible way they look also hinder them. A few of the stunts are okay but nothing more than that.
Characters are basically every stereotype in the book it seems and are one-dimensional caricatures with no likeability or development and with the inability to behave logically. The acting is very poor, with Dolph Lundgren (who can be watchable) looking uncomfortable, even then he is the least bad actor here. Even Corbin Bernson is not good. The ending makes no sense and the climactic moments are rushed, anti-climactic and things feel poorly tied up, with too much happening stupidly and too easily.
Overall, a mess. 1/10 Bethany Cox
Saw 'Maximum Security' anyway out of curiosity, being intrigued by the idea and having been a lot of low-budget films recently (most not very good to put it lightly). Seeing it, 'Maximum Security' turned out to be more or less, make that exactly even, what was expected. Except worse. It doesn't even start off well, not much grabs the attention. The film got even worse very quickly and never recovered or improved. Actually got pretty much worse as it progressed.
On a visual level, 'Maximum Security' looked shoddy. Drab and simplistic, with haphazard editing, far from slick photography and very artificial-looking effects
The sound is very poorly recorded (one doesn't expect a film from 2017 to sound like something from 50 years or so before), the music is one-note and repetitive and the direction has no sense of atmosphere or pacing, nothing to be thrilled by and nothing much engaging.
'Maximum Security's' script is awkward-sounding and ponderous, with lines that do make one cringe. A lot of it is gibberish and juvenile, with a stilted improvisatory feel that shouldn't have made it past draft stages.
On top of that, the story goes through the motions with no tension, suspense or thrills, a lot of intelligence-insulting ridiculousness, implausibility and pacing so dull that it makes a reasonably short length much longer. The action sequences are more preposterous and by the numbers than they are thrilling or fun, that is when they are used, for such a title, idea and cover 'Maximum Security' is very short on the quantity of the action. The terrible way they look also hinder them. A few of the stunts are okay but nothing more than that.
Characters are basically every stereotype in the book it seems and are one-dimensional caricatures with no likeability or development and with the inability to behave logically. The acting is very poor, with Dolph Lundgren (who can be watchable) looking uncomfortable, even then he is the least bad actor here. Even Corbin Bernson is not good. The ending makes no sense and the climactic moments are rushed, anti-climactic and things feel poorly tied up, with too much happening stupidly and too easily.
Overall, a mess. 1/10 Bethany Cox
Probably the worst movie I've seen this year. Only thing worse than the acting was the dialogue and the 2-note soundtrack. (Hmm I wonder why it is necessary to have 5 lines minimum here. This movie was not worth wasting any more than 2 lines on! I prefer to be recommending films but when I can't, I just don't want to be really derogatory.)
Lo sapevi?
- QuizTutte le opzioni contengono spoiler
- ConnessioniReferenced in I Must Break This Podcast: Larceny/Riot (2022)
- Colonne sonoreBacklash
by Shotgun Radio
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Larceny?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Larceny
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 27 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti

Divario superiore
By what name was L'infiltrato (2017) officially released in Canada in English?
Rispondi