VALUTAZIONE IMDb
7,0/10
1336
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaAfter rigorous testing in 1961, a small group of skilled female pilots are asked to step aside when only men are selected for the spaceflight.After rigorous testing in 1961, a small group of skilled female pilots are asked to step aside when only men are selected for the spaceflight.After rigorous testing in 1961, a small group of skilled female pilots are asked to step aside when only men are selected for the spaceflight.
- Premi
- 1 candidatura in totale
Jacqueline Cochran
- Self - Pilot
- (filmato d'archivio)
Janey Hart
- Self - Pilot
- (filmato d'archivio)
Bernice Steadman
- Self - Pilot
- (filmato d'archivio)
- (as "B" Steadman)
Randy Lovelace
- Self - Doctor, Aerospace Medicine
- (filmato d'archivio)
Jerrie Cobb
- Self - Pilot
- (filmato d'archivio)
John Glenn
- Self - Mercury Astronaut
- (filmato d'archivio)
Gordon Cooper
- Self - Project Mercury Astronaut
- (filmato d'archivio)
Myrtle Cagle
- Self - Pilot
- (filmato d'archivio)
- (as Myrtle K Cagle)
Recensioni in evidenza
Listless and artless and toneless. Nice artwork though.
This was a brilliant documentary of the Mercury 13. Women who fought to become a part of the NASA astronaut training program but were ultimately denied due to unrealistic standards.
I am a giant space nerd. I have visited every space vehicle museum in the US. And only now did I learn about the Mercury 13. These women. These amazing women who wanted nothing more than a chance. A chance to see space and be a part of the journey.
This documentary is amazing. And if I was a teacher or in charge of education standards I would make every student watch this along with the Mercury 7 story.
What is so wrong with telling the whole story.
I am a giant space nerd. I have visited every space vehicle museum in the US. And only now did I learn about the Mercury 13. These women. These amazing women who wanted nothing more than a chance. A chance to see space and be a part of the journey.
This documentary is amazing. And if I was a teacher or in charge of education standards I would make every student watch this along with the Mercury 7 story.
What is so wrong with telling the whole story.
Everyone should see this, and since it's on Netflix, it's easy. This episode in the history of the USA space program was a reflection of the 1960's society of the time, but obvious echos still ring today. A doctor attached to the Mercury space capsule program, Dr. Lovelace, started a program on his own initiative to recruit women pilots for possible astronaut training. The ones who passed all the (sometimes bizarre) physical tests, the "Mercury 13", had high hopes of going further but NASA, Congress, and VP Lyndon Johnson summarily dismissed it for reasons that were nothing more than blatant sexism. All the women were accomplished pilots and first-rate human beings by any standard, but the arbitrary "rules" of qualification for astronaut training were such that no woman could meet them -- despite the fact that no piloting was even needed for Mercury capsules; the astronauts were just "spam in a can" as the saying went.
These ladies drew career inspiration from a still earlier generation of women pilots who flew in WWII (the WASPS), including Jacqueline Cochrane who features prominently in the doc. Cochrane herself wanted to be an astronaut, but didn't pass the physicals that the younger women did, and later on betrayed them during crucial Senate hearings about the astronaut program. John Glenn, the fair-haired hero of these early stages of the space program, also comes in for some criticism; he's someone who could have given meaningful support to the women at a critical stage, but did not.
Just like these womens' hopes, the Mercury 13 history has been largely buried, so this doc is very timely. A number of them are still around to be interviewed and tell their story first-hand, and boy are they great to hear. (Dr. Lovelace's daughter is an interviewee as well, and she's excellent.) It's easy to get outraged on their behalf, but that might be too simplistic. Listen to them first. They in turn have clearly been role models and inspirations for the women who have now become a regular part of space exploration.
The chronology of this film is frequently spliced in with absolutely gorgeous flight scenery accompanied by a graceful, soaring musical score. Oh, the magic of flight. Those scenes alone make it worth seeing this fine production.
These ladies drew career inspiration from a still earlier generation of women pilots who flew in WWII (the WASPS), including Jacqueline Cochrane who features prominently in the doc. Cochrane herself wanted to be an astronaut, but didn't pass the physicals that the younger women did, and later on betrayed them during crucial Senate hearings about the astronaut program. John Glenn, the fair-haired hero of these early stages of the space program, also comes in for some criticism; he's someone who could have given meaningful support to the women at a critical stage, but did not.
Just like these womens' hopes, the Mercury 13 history has been largely buried, so this doc is very timely. A number of them are still around to be interviewed and tell their story first-hand, and boy are they great to hear. (Dr. Lovelace's daughter is an interviewee as well, and she's excellent.) It's easy to get outraged on their behalf, but that might be too simplistic. Listen to them first. They in turn have clearly been role models and inspirations for the women who have now become a regular part of space exploration.
The chronology of this film is frequently spliced in with absolutely gorgeous flight scenery accompanied by a graceful, soaring musical score. Oh, the magic of flight. Those scenes alone make it worth seeing this fine production.
The Space Race was not a game. Nor was it something in the far distant future. It was deadly serious, immediate, and with far-reaching geopolitical consequences in a world where the threat of global nuclear annihilation and totalitarian communism was very real, and where much of the world was made up of non-aligned, newly independent nations trying to decide whether to ally with the West or with Moscow. Demonstrating technological superiority in space was an important tool in swaying people & nations to side with us.
The stakes were high and the list of unknowns stretched beyond the horizon. Some of the early medical examinations and experiments foisted upon astronaut candidates were truly bizarre, because nobody really knew anything about space, or what to expect, or how zero gravity or radiation would affect the human body. So they essentially made stuff up and did everything they could think of to the astronaut candidates, including lots of cameras and metal probes in places where the sun don't shine. Imagine the awkwardness of including women in such invasive and seemingly pointless examinations. Imagine the self-limiting and self-censoring effect that would have had on the early doctors and program architects who were trying to navigate their way through completely unknown territory, trying to get astronauts prepared for space.
Virtually all the astronauts were military, and served as combat fighter pilots or test pilots or both. Why? because they: 1) understood mortal danger 2) understood chain of command 3) were accustomed to long, strenuous, invasive, harsh training regimens
NASA wasn't selecting from a pool of "men" but from the pool of "fighter/test pilot". Women were excluded not primarily (or only) because they were women but because they were CIVILIAN. Why? Because women generally were not part of military combat. Why? Because our culture wasn't (and still isn't) ok with shipping millions of women off to fight, kill, bleed, and die. Men, yes. Always.
Men have always been the expendable sex to be shipped off to kill and die. We dress it up in shiny ways to make it more palatable, with stuff about "honor" "duty" etc. but the brute fact is men are expendable, so they get to die. One of the consequences of this is that occasionally, this actually leads to a benefit and privilege, like prestige assignments such as the astronaut corps. When your mortal enemy suddenly has a commanding and existentially threatening lead in space (If they can launch satellites into space, they can launch nuclear warheads into space) and you need to quickly create a human space program in response, you draw from the most appropriate existing talent pool: fighter pilots & test pilots.
Viewed in its proper historical context, crying "boo sexism! men bad!" seems utterly myopic & narcissistic, and emblematic of a sheltered 21st century perspective that wants to re-frame Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo as some kind of entitlement program that women were unfairly and deliberately excluded from, rather than something the U.S. desperately needed to succeed. The space program didn't exist to make astronauts feel good, fulfilled, and self-actualized. Astronauts were selected, trained, and used as guinea pigs so that the space program could succeed. Before asking "why weren't women *allowed* to be in the space program?", one must first ask "why weren't millions of women *allowed* to be drafted against their will to fight, kill, bleed and die, and to be used as guinea pigs in dangerous programs since time immemorial?"
The stakes were high and the list of unknowns stretched beyond the horizon. Some of the early medical examinations and experiments foisted upon astronaut candidates were truly bizarre, because nobody really knew anything about space, or what to expect, or how zero gravity or radiation would affect the human body. So they essentially made stuff up and did everything they could think of to the astronaut candidates, including lots of cameras and metal probes in places where the sun don't shine. Imagine the awkwardness of including women in such invasive and seemingly pointless examinations. Imagine the self-limiting and self-censoring effect that would have had on the early doctors and program architects who were trying to navigate their way through completely unknown territory, trying to get astronauts prepared for space.
Virtually all the astronauts were military, and served as combat fighter pilots or test pilots or both. Why? because they: 1) understood mortal danger 2) understood chain of command 3) were accustomed to long, strenuous, invasive, harsh training regimens
NASA wasn't selecting from a pool of "men" but from the pool of "fighter/test pilot". Women were excluded not primarily (or only) because they were women but because they were CIVILIAN. Why? Because women generally were not part of military combat. Why? Because our culture wasn't (and still isn't) ok with shipping millions of women off to fight, kill, bleed, and die. Men, yes. Always.
Men have always been the expendable sex to be shipped off to kill and die. We dress it up in shiny ways to make it more palatable, with stuff about "honor" "duty" etc. but the brute fact is men are expendable, so they get to die. One of the consequences of this is that occasionally, this actually leads to a benefit and privilege, like prestige assignments such as the astronaut corps. When your mortal enemy suddenly has a commanding and existentially threatening lead in space (If they can launch satellites into space, they can launch nuclear warheads into space) and you need to quickly create a human space program in response, you draw from the most appropriate existing talent pool: fighter pilots & test pilots.
Viewed in its proper historical context, crying "boo sexism! men bad!" seems utterly myopic & narcissistic, and emblematic of a sheltered 21st century perspective that wants to re-frame Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo as some kind of entitlement program that women were unfairly and deliberately excluded from, rather than something the U.S. desperately needed to succeed. The space program didn't exist to make astronauts feel good, fulfilled, and self-actualized. Astronauts were selected, trained, and used as guinea pigs so that the space program could succeed. Before asking "why weren't women *allowed* to be in the space program?", one must first ask "why weren't millions of women *allowed* to be drafted against their will to fight, kill, bleed and die, and to be used as guinea pigs in dangerous programs since time immemorial?"
5/4/18. Interesting to watch, from a historical perspective. it is sad and a tragedy that these women didn't get a chance to go into space because of the sexual discrimination at the time. Reasons for denying them the chance now seem totally preposterous. However, the interviews of these women probably could have been done better.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizAstronaut Eileen Collins was first woman and American Space Shuttle pilot and later, the first Space Shuttle Commander. She logged four missions into Space on the Space Shuttle. She is the winner of the prestigious Harmon Trophy and has spent 38 days 8 hours and 20 minutes in outer space. She is a retired USAF Colonel and test pilot.
- BlooperReversed image. At 39:59 a TH-55 (Hughes 269) U.S. Army trainer hovers by the camera from left to right. The collective control is clearly visible in what appears to be the pilot's right hand. The collective is on the pilots left and thus the image must be reversed.
- ConnessioniReferenced in For All Mankind: Nixon's Women (2019)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Mercury 13?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Меркурий 13
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 18 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti

Divario superiore
By what name was Mercury 13 (2018) officially released in Canada in English?
Rispondi