VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,2/10
4983
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Un giovane banchiere di Wall Street viene retrocesso alla sua città natale e inizia a indagare su un'intricata rete di corruzione e frode nello stato di New York, che colpisce la sua carrier... Leggi tuttoUn giovane banchiere di Wall Street viene retrocesso alla sua città natale e inizia a indagare su un'intricata rete di corruzione e frode nello stato di New York, che colpisce la sua carriera e la sua vita personale.Un giovane banchiere di Wall Street viene retrocesso alla sua città natale e inizia a indagare su un'intricata rete di corruzione e frode nello stato di New York, che colpisce la sua carriera e la sua vita personale.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Riepilogo
Reviewers say 'Crypto' (2019) delves into cryptocurrency, money laundering, and family drama with the Russian mafia. Criticisms focus on poor acting, particularly from the lead, and a convoluted plot. Some appreciate its attempt to tackle complex financial themes, while others find it superficial and lacking depth. The portrayal of cryptocurrency is often deemed misleading or simplistic, contributing to mixed reception.
Recensioni in evidenza
The movie was good and in my opinion the pace was right.
I enjoyed everything and never I was bored.
After reading the reviews from haters of their life (this is the real reason why they spit on the others), I understood that wasting time is not watching the movie, it's reading reviews from haters... I read even that Al Pacino is not good in acting... come on, where did you let your brain before writing something so stupid?
Everytime someone says... bad acting. Probably you don't even know what is acting, because you never acted and you'll never act in your whole life, but at your home... please, be smart... stop writing about something you don't know.
"Stay away, run away from this movie"... someone wrote that... to the intelligent people... stay away, run away from people who write something like that and watch the movie... you can't decide just after reading some reviews, it's not clever.
If you want to have a good life, stay away from negative people...
After reading the reviews from haters of their life (this is the real reason why they spit on the others), I understood that wasting time is not watching the movie, it's reading reviews from haters... I read even that Al Pacino is not good in acting... come on, where did you let your brain before writing something so stupid?
Everytime someone says... bad acting. Probably you don't even know what is acting, because you never acted and you'll never act in your whole life, but at your home... please, be smart... stop writing about something you don't know.
"Stay away, run away from this movie"... someone wrote that... to the intelligent people... stay away, run away from people who write something like that and watch the movie... you can't decide just after reading some reviews, it's not clever.
If you want to have a good life, stay away from negative people...
I get that all three writers are amateurs, but didn't the producers at least pick up on the need for a fine tune/re-write of this convoluted mess of a script?
There's little story that actually makes any sense amongst a ton of buzz words no one will understand in the entire 105 mins of this film, and for that length of time, certainly some unnecessary scenes could've been omitted and others (including the buzz word scenes) elaborated upon. It was never made clear what Martins full duty was, or why he left the big city head office, and so on. It's as if a 5+ hour decent screenplay was shredded, and random pieces put together to total the final runtime. I could go on and on, but it's such a shame no one invested in a seasoned screenwriter to at least fine tune the script, as this production had many decent values to it. The pacing was also slow for my liking, and this film needed to be trimmed down to 90 mins (with a proper script) or played back at 1.2x speed.
The directing/camera work was well executed. The acting by all leads was spot on and convincing, but casting Beau Knapp as Martin was another big mistake. He didn't suit that role/character, and his acting was way too bland. He'd been better off being cast as one of the thugs, instead of pretty much sleeping in his suit trying to act like a white collar exec.
The score was too outstanding for this film... I mean top notch, and created some great tension and suspense, but seemed overbearing next to the convoluted plot.
Aside from that, unless you have any idea about crypto currency and forensic accounting (luckily I do, and I was still confused), you'll lose interest in this film pretty fast.
Really too bad considering everything else was done really well. Sadly, it's only a generous 6/10 from me.
There's little story that actually makes any sense amongst a ton of buzz words no one will understand in the entire 105 mins of this film, and for that length of time, certainly some unnecessary scenes could've been omitted and others (including the buzz word scenes) elaborated upon. It was never made clear what Martins full duty was, or why he left the big city head office, and so on. It's as if a 5+ hour decent screenplay was shredded, and random pieces put together to total the final runtime. I could go on and on, but it's such a shame no one invested in a seasoned screenwriter to at least fine tune the script, as this production had many decent values to it. The pacing was also slow for my liking, and this film needed to be trimmed down to 90 mins (with a proper script) or played back at 1.2x speed.
The directing/camera work was well executed. The acting by all leads was spot on and convincing, but casting Beau Knapp as Martin was another big mistake. He didn't suit that role/character, and his acting was way too bland. He'd been better off being cast as one of the thugs, instead of pretty much sleeping in his suit trying to act like a white collar exec.
The score was too outstanding for this film... I mean top notch, and created some great tension and suspense, but seemed overbearing next to the convoluted plot.
Aside from that, unless you have any idea about crypto currency and forensic accounting (luckily I do, and I was still confused), you'll lose interest in this film pretty fast.
Really too bad considering everything else was done really well. Sadly, it's only a generous 6/10 from me.
Not a bad movie but not a particularly good one either. Held my interest but was slow and hard to follow in some places. Will watch anything with Kurt Russell. Lead's acting was strong during the family stuff, but weaker in many other scenes.
Suspect I will have forgotten about it by tomorrow but on the other hand I never turned it off or threw anything at the screen. I was expecting a smarter thriller like Shattered Glass so that didn't help. At least it wasn't super dumb.
I found this movie entertaining. The story of an estranged son who comes back to his hometown as an auditor, to uncover some crooked financial matters. There he finds family again, healing wounds of a painful past and rediscovering his father, brother, his roots. The actor mumbles with a horse face grin because it's part of the character.
Nothing out of this world but then not as bad as some people say it is.
I was really hoping that this movie would be educational for many people but unfortunately it will paint a negative image for crypto in general...that crypto is used for shady purposes like drugs, prostitution, porn and money laundering. But the fact is that the total market cap of the entire crypto market at the moment (April 2019) is around $134 billion and the banks have been FINED since 2008 for an of $243 BILLION!!! The main problem is that majority of the people don't understand how the monetary system works and what is broken in our current system and what exactly crypto is trying to fix. Only if people could understand or educate themselves about it, poorly realized movies like these wouldn't fool us about crypto anymore!
Lo sapevi?
- QuizMonths after release, many who contributed to the crowd funding requested a refund.
- BlooperFor the purposes of a thematic historical reference, most of the action supposedly takes place in Elba, New York. The city limit sign seen at the start of the film shows it has a population of 2,370, but the locations (such as a large shopping mall) are clearly in a much more populous town. Some identifiable settings are in more urbanized areas over 300 miles from the real Elba. It's acceptable for films to create a fictional version of a real town, but they should have changed the population sign to make it more consistent with the chosen locations.
- Citazioni
Martin Duran Sr.: Appreciate it. Lot better than a pop on the nose.
- Colonne sonoreShowtime
written by Reynaldo Cartegna
performed by Annale
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Crypto?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 20.440 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 45 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.66 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
