Recensioni degli utenti

Tension, suspense, horror n scare factor are all missing in the first hour except for dull chit chats n pg13 love making scenes.

Ther are unnecessary flashback scenes repeatedly showing the same slashings n killings.

Its only when the action moves back to the present 90s n the mall, we get to see some action but here too, the ghosts are not terrifying unlike in part 1 n 2.

Generous with a 5 cos the guy with big eyeballs gets nailed in the eye.

It's just okay, not good, not bad. But Kiana acting is quite bad for me, even Benjamin Flores act way better than her. Absolutely not Leading Actress type, dissappointing. But you know? If you get bored, and wanna watch something new, this is alright, Stranger Things type, but bad version.

This is the worse part from the trilogy, the second one (1978) is the best than this and the first one.

Gone are the wonderful presence of Sadie Sink and Emily Rudd. Kiana Madeira is once again thrust back into the lead. She gives it a go is probably the only nice thing I can say about her acting ability, you know when someone has "it" and when someone doesn't and she most definitely doesn't so the film sufferers greatly for this. Had a more capable actress been the lead I wonder what could have been as the overall story is decent.

We learned who the princess of air and darkness is.

Not as unintentionally funny as the first part and not pointless like the second, this final installment is the best movie out of the three. Few things that make no sense, but they finally remembered the contrast between Shadyside and Sunnyvale, which they kept shoving down our throats in the first act of1994 and then it was like never mentioned again. Still not properly explained, though, serial killers was not the only problem Shadyside had.

The 1666 section, ignoring the accents and line delivery, was by far the best of anything the trilogy had to offer. It was actually good. The 1994 half, not so much, but at least the plot was finally going forward.

I don't understand how that person in the end was revealed to the community to be a serial killer. What evidence did they find? He didn't even kill anyone personally, he barely did anything, just read from a book.

This may count as spoilers. I found that the person that cut a deal with the devil was completely ripped off, they should have their lawyer present next time. Big house, good jobs for the family, prosperous and free of accidents and murders town. That's it? I understand Sunnyvale was not hit by the depression, but come on devil, we are sacrificing people here. Don't be stingy, you can do better.

I liked the first one, the second one was better, this was below average. I don't like the main actress and I thought the story would entirely be set in 1666 but it wasn't. Watch the second one for the best story.

My main problem with this movie is that none of the the actors have the ability to do a decent accent. Most are bad but some are just laughable. I mean , unless they came from some country yet to be discovered, I don't know where they are supposed to be from. If you can get passed that ( good luck) and u enjoyed the first two parts then you will probably like it equally as much.

This is actually the best sentence in the movie which is over the majority of its running time - despite its admirable ambition to paint a convincing picture about being different - the weakest of the franchise. Yes, it wraps up all loose ends and delivers on a small scale a surprise about the Who and why but got overly entangled in finding a deeper meaning.

Typical Netflix dreck they have been producing for some time now. Part 1 was bad. Part 2 was better, but nothing great. Part 3 is just as bad as 1 if not worse. There are more ways to show that your film is set in a certain time than stuffing period music down your throat every 6 minutes. Thankfully part 3 couldnt use it as a crutch, at least not as much. Filled with characters you couldn't care less about, CG blood and stories that keep you watching just because you have already invested so much time in, that you may as well finish it. These are good examples of why Netflix is becoming the last place I end up visiting to find something to watch. I think this may have been the final nail in the coffin for me. I'm sure by this point they are relieved that they made the choice of muting their customer's voices and did away with the user reviews and star ratings.

I binge watched all three parts of Fear Street last night and it kept me occupied as I drank beers and played with my phone every now and again. Will I remember this trilogy in a few months? No. It's forgettable, but it's not as bad as some of the reviews make it out to be.

One of my biggest gripes with this trilogy has been the writing, which has consistently been quite weak in part 1 & 3 (a little better in part 2). It's just that, in this film, none of the lead characters actually feel remotely real. The plot never really moves forward through their actions. Things just kind of happen and the characters respond to it as if they are completely psychopathic.

I don't think I've seen many films with more dis-likeable main characters before. The lead actress was just dreadful across each part. I think that part 2 was the best of this trilogy because she was in it less and there was a stronger actress and character in the lead for that film. The strongest parts of this trilogy are where the lead characters (Deena & Sam) are not in it, which really tells you a lot about the writing here. The supporting characters are far more enjoyable to watch and I think are played quite well considering what the actors had to work with.

The effects and gore are pretty solid and there are some entertaining moments in this film and the other parts before it. If you want to watch a slasher for the kills and not really focus too much on the details, then this might be for you. There's a story underneath all of this but, to be honest, it's a bit convoluted in places - the film is at its best with its kills and when it focuses on its supporting characters. Those moments are far more enjoyable. You could tune the rest of it out.

It's definitely not awful, but there are certainly better slasher films out there.

I like Part 1 because of some old school horror style deaths. Part 2 was boring and predictable. The only 90's and 70's elememt in the movies respectively was the (huge amount of) music but didn't help me to feel like being in those decades. Part 3, if you exclude the first 30 minutes, where basically almost nothing happens, it's an interesting conclusion to the whole trilogy with a built of agony but not caring deeper because the characters are not well written. The acting was decent, though. For all of you, who voted this movie with 10, do a favour to yourself and watch movies like The Thing or The Shining.

'Fear Street: 1994' was a stylish and promising horror thriller. Sure, it wasn't all that 'thrilling' at all and it was hard to care for the cheesy characters without any background at all, but its neon 90s vibes and a decent production made it stand out and hope for an improvement in what we already knew would be a horror trilogy. And that improvement came immediately in the second part, if not by much. The fact that it was a gorier, more solid 'slasher' as we understand the genre and that the links between the story and the characters and events we already knew from part one made us care more for them made it a more pleasurable run. It still lacked something big, the most important part of a story, specially if you plan on telling a story through three whole full feature length films. It lacked a meaning, an explanation, a purpose. Fortunately the cliffhanger from 'Fear Street: 1978' made it pretty clear that's what we were getting in the last instalment.

And that's where the reviewed title comes in, with a really conservative take on the origin of it all. The first half of 'Fear street: 1666' is nothing but your mainstream17th century witchcraft tale with a little twist to spice it up a little. The gore and violence are quite tame, the action is almost lacking and the atmosphere and tension, while present, are miles away from similar titles like 'The VVitch'. It still provides a satisfying and effective explanation for the mistery surrounding Shadyside and having the cast from the original two films playing the characters from this origin story works really well for making us care more for them and display some interesting similarities with the relations the characters plaid by those actors have in the future. But explaining the reason behind Shadyside's curse isn't enough, we need to put an end to it.

And that's where the movie derails. Back to the future, back to 1994 and immediately the shift in the visuals and the tone is so abrupt it instantly takes you out of the movie. The story reintroduces some really goofy characters for comedy relief, the vibe goes back to the first film with its overly preteen 'Goosebumps' thriller like atmosphere and the soundtrack (while undeniably good, gotta approve seeing 'Pixies' getting some love) is one again so overly present it doesn't help at all to soften the abrupt transition. The only welcome change is the return to the stylish neony cinematography, and even that is just a matter of personal taste. So after some poorly executed climax battle scenes where the alleged driving force for the mindless killers to chase one victim or another seems to change freely to accommodate the script we get a bleak -although still fitting- happy resolution that feels too unsatisfying after over 5 hours of run through the whole thing. Impossible to let this end without a cheesy after-credits -or is it inter-credits- cliffhanger scene where an unknown character gets his/her hands on a vital plot item that despite being evidence for a multiple homicide lies marked but unguarded in the middle of a cave -good job police!-. Homage to the classic 90s' slashers or an open door to a follow-up? Surely very few are hoping for the latter.

Better than part one and worse than part two, this brought the story of the witch and how the curse has began. There's a nice plot, but not exactly unexpected. While the first two movies appeals for the classic slash movies, the third one seems to have no conection at all with that. It seems odd, even if it keeps the same characters of the first. An 'okay' ending, but I expected much more.

I have to admit i didn't like the first 2 films that much but i liked the twist at the end of this film. Both 1978 and 1666 could have fit into a 30 min flashback instead of 2 films. It would have been better as a TV show. Also what happened to Dinas stab wound witch Sam gave to her at the end of 1978?!?!? It magically dissappeard. Lots of flaws in the film and the director really tried to drag these film out for an extra 1hr.